OCR Text |
Show -3- Irrigation Efficiencies Existing Projects, Lower Colorado River Basin (Notes and Sources) Imperial Column 3 Calif. Ex. 238 4 Item 96, Calif. Ex. 275 5 Mr. Dowd's Testimony minus 20.6 mi. Imperial to Pilot Knob 6 Negligible 7 (6)^(5) 8 Items 80 & 96, Calif. Ex. 275, = 3201.0 450.3 9 Items91 &96, Calif. Ex.275, = 192.0 450.3 10 Items 90 & 96, Calif. Ex. 275, = 812.0 450.3 11 (9) + (10) 13 Item 97, Calif. Ex. 275 (includes cities and towns) 14 (13)-(8) 15 Calif. Ex. 282 (excludes leaching water) 16 (15)^(8) 17 (13) - (15) 18 (17)-(13) Coachella (6-A) 3 Table 1, Calif. Ex.318 4 Table 2, Calif. Ex. 318 5 Project Records 6 Project Records 7 (6)-(5) 8 Item 4, Table 4, Calif. Ex. 318, = 390.4 (below check 6-A) 49.4 9 Item 10, Table 4, Calif. Ex. 318, = 52L1 (below check 6-A) 49.4 10 Items 7, 11, 12, 13, Table 4, Calif. Ex. 318, = 67^5 (below check 6-A) 49.4 11 (9) + (10) 12 (11)-h(8) 13 Item 14, Table 4, Calif. Ex. 318, = 270.8 49.4 14 (13)-(8) 15 Table 2, Calif. Ex. 318 (excludes leaching water) 16 (15) -(8) 17 (13)-(15) 18 (17)-(13) |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |