| OCR Text |
Show betwee hill aNU @hoTmer-atlorney 1n Dankrup first sai that an attorney had taken away his books, and had induce him to do illegal and improper things, and had placed him i such a position that he could not make up his accounts The that attorney made complaints of a like serious nature agains the bankrupt To see two gentlemen, officers of the Court castinga disgrace upon the profession, which the professio ough to, and wou'd h had no doubt resent in some way wa most sad That Court, however, could not enter into thos questions, except with regard tQ what had been the conduct o the bankrupt before and since his bankruptey So far as he (th Mr, Williams, and by Mr. Parry for the bankrupt,-Mr, B adg§o did not oppose the granting of {he bankrupts' discharge, as h did not think they had done anything to bring themselves unde any section of the Bankruptey Act.-Discharge granted LT - I ON D o ST Commissioner) could punish him under the 159th clause of th Act, he should consider it his du'y to do so severely H should therefore suspend bankrupt's order of discharge tor nin months, and should refuse protection In re Wall and Rooker, Vyse Street, Birmingham, gold chai makers.-Meeting for last examination and discharge, attende by Mr. C. B. Hodgson for the trade assignee, by Mr, Fitter for |
