| OCR Text |
Show appear to be the historic colors, as no other layers of color are detectable. Window sills on both stories are rectangular blocks of rough-faced limestone. The top surfaces of the lower-level sills are worn, stained, and beginning to spall. First-story lintels are larger blocks of the same stone, and are in good condition. The tops of the second-story windows meet the fascia board of the cornice. The condition of the roof as viewed from the south facade, as in general, appears to be extremely bad, evidenced by worn and missing shingles, buckling, and frayed and rotting edges. Roofing on the cupola is extremely deteriorated, as are the soffit, louvers, and wood shingles of the . cupola's vertical surface. Traces of the same cream color used on window sills elsewhere in the building are seen on the soffit of the cupola, and the wooden shingles show traces of green paint. The central projecting dormer on this elevation shows the same type of deterioration to its roof, though not as extreme as on the cupola. The dormer is badly weathered, but traces of the same cream and green paint used on the cupola can be detected. The dormer window frame and sash appear to have been painted cream and black, repeating the color scheme used on windows elsewhere in the building. weathered. The wooden window sill is badly cracked and Wood frame and sash of the multi-light awning window are intact but in poor condition, and there are several loose, cracked and missing panes. The deep cornice of the south facade is badly weathered and shows extensive water damage, which appears to be due to the failure of 13 |
