| OCR Text |
Show 18.5 in the opposition expressed by De r'n Fo1loy;ing Governor he ar i.nga "the T:-'ibune 2. , at this sugbested or as a regret . over ae ek i.ng a relieving . . responSl b 1 1 1 t y." at the Eouse Comrai, ttee the remark that particularly 48 burden, which wholesome grips to Tribune had the with the first was federal governent the .. The e d ltorlal damage already sustained by the lay in coming noted, spokesmen. expresse d the Utah ten-year option plan would only invite A ranges. other car-r i ed gover-nor' is of means a 1 OglC· al appearance d i tOl"'ial unitedly 2.8 . ,.. s these in view of the fact that the west has been tie, re3Jresented e of t1e s t.a'teraerrt ' problem. And, as more de previously urged effective remedil action as ho early as doubt that true editors felt there was no governor's statenent at the hearings was a The September, 1930.',/ the sentinent throughout Utah. reflection of the II Beyond issue of situation in Ut, the cession extrenely difficult are reflected in the hearings, in the of western alignment exception in their may be seen opposition 48"posi tion 1932, p. pp. there in the to Kade wa.s no interests. to frame. the meaningful pattern (An outstanding The State united Vloolgrowers Clear," S8 t L2.ke Tribune, 164-65. on As conservation interests, cession.) 4. 49Sura, generalizations Feb. 16, |
