| OCR Text |
Show 56 in the Ea.s t not I.:idwest, , South, or in the VTest itself. but - it Specificc..lly, E. both 301"2]1_, of point mos t tance that they Yet unlike felt and Eor8 to was restrict tion. under the tIers acr e s Idaho," he western to expected of horne s te ad passion explains why, during he the was resources impression the work to Heyburn, IdwlO in which of that case Idaho in "Three we people of four was done large hundred a and desire in than there would to the bill lengthy Senate to r.lention conjunction with as set- new size.h32 :!1eyburn's opposition course plel!ty for reclama- il."'riG2.tion projects is larger than only senator that this 32U.S., Apr. 15, 1902, in of in their state actually of more settlers. bill, Heyburn the po t errt i.a.L f'Low into "Vie want , new states in that it had enormous an impor- we s te.rr; would According deve l opmerrt rapid announce d The natur8 of supporters represented by homesteads debates, attract ava.i.Lab Le land would al.Lovr, t'wenty small no and many other the tlest there. therefore, could be as the see C22"'ey and ::ev:l2.J-lds Act, nunbe r- be Smoot Enlarged Homes te ad the f'or-e s aw rrratter of a geographical conditions settlement and, He to and other 2.l'TIOng the uniq_ue of wat e r desire that such that were is It joined \'!i th Snoot 811Q Uilliam Eeybu1"l'"l Idao, vzho deb2.ted the opposition view- vigorously. in the senators Senators ,'leldon B. was conservation of the bill. One gets only in desperation. Congress, Senate, 60th Cong., 1st Con;,=-;-.:_"ession2 Record, C "7, '767. Upon sess., |
