| OCR Text |
Show 176 be considered to the prop is concerned ought osition that this nresent gr arrt is 81 we are I don't thin]: we ar-e ever ever goinG to [et.I don't t}ink vte are Eoing to get the forests. ever goir..g to cet the rai.ner-al s that ar-e now If He carl afford to t2J:e the Lands as reserved. they ar e, that is the pI"oposi tion we ought to :2lt I have no f'aith in the idea ;:-roceed on. on .... \ve are hfr-tis i :P;Y -:e /fs.C't;.p a?\,_'1_1e i because the feelinF of the 'United States I have been up acainst it in that cuestion. __ vO t._,e t.J ,O I thinl: :L sense u.'- on _ es o v _ t.J c....L l.e_ c;.. - a good r.any places.)7 reaffirming this view ·;';hen adm i, tted under neither would which the First of for or that U't ah wou l.d rr.inerals the pointed governor out, =-=ig_"'rl'vtay Act, feclercl state not federal .. economic disadvantages the cession of public ment. funds In under funds provisions lands would cost population, end miles was granted toward 37Telegr, states, the total on the cost the of the Federal Aid of post roads. req_uired dollar for dollar in order to public-land As allotted to all states Here containing :public lands funds not impose. all, bsis of 2rea, he 2 nyway i additioncl money in te construction of roads. Utah the forests compensate cession would hearings, however, cue s t i oru.ng explicit really want either at the A to match the gain other hd, of each on the allot- the federal project was George H. Dern to Don B. Colton, Nov. 21, This Ut State Archives, Dern Corresnondence File. statement-was made in reaction to the eneated exnressions a't the Governors' Conf'er-e nce by 'i'linter and Jenl:ins that ces sion of public lands would be the first step in Getting ces sion of all public resources. 1931, |
