| OCR Text |
Show 55 EO!:'2.... further r-emar-ke d however, that he anyone who wou Ld , "would be' in favor _ 0= si ving 320 2-"YlC_ r-e de en theI1 Snoot te bill as re::erence to of thousds even the at simply not VIi thou t was the on to types Teller of "is the introc.uce v.ou Ld and se:::2.tol" t11en this Dust be bill under discussion, it became was at clear where the avoided. would be this point the real were irrigated for water he , it is pro Henry Cabot Lodge of wor-c s ve::atious nonirrigable Land s stead grants fo It rio s t took the , there of l2.Dd that class his "belief that expressed e xamp Le carried in buckets. inserting a avoid mis- dollars per acre, .A.21d Senator I·:2.ss2.chusetts warned the.t '1.JiQJ_ity, w i thout for entry. could not be unless procured ,,30 provide for. 'ser::i-arid" for colleagues that 'thou s and a could not be to claim that to land available of of land which acres cost "senicTid," or lands 1129 suppo r t in his of Colorado, inform his "':hat," he insisted, po se d "ar-Ld" wor ds the Ser2.tor Henry r·:. floor dry f3.1"Bing proposition. a ar Ld go upon d2."'2.fted in teY'1S exp l Lc.i t enough, was unde r-s tand irig Senate to acres as "a good e "arid" l.enerrt doughty and 2D of e as te.rn enlarging home- the proposed by the thing."J1 in the Senate opposition to debates that the bill lay. 29Ibid. 30Ibid., .31U•S., 4218 • Congress, Senate, 60th Cong., 1st C 'I, 4402. Apr. 15, 1908, Conr:-reEsion2 ?ecord, se ss, |
