| OCR Text |
Show 178 such .":;i thout effective management specialists, would be inconceivable. A third cession proposed Sj stem ing factor in Governor Dern's of r-e cLama't i.on. gover-n merrt .. being , in Article :power to the IV "dispose regulations respecting belonging no longer not this to the owned projects? it, saw the because Constitution or giving Congress other If the the of that all needful rules and territory these lands, its he projects only United States." jeopardize r-e c Lams.t Lon As and make the with the exist- government of limited powers, a of the of the is t.hought s went to the heart could construct reclation provision tampering considerations. of constitutional federal is fear of was against case governor property federal goverpent q_ueried, might constitutional warrant for building ventured He an of his answe r own i if the Federal Gove!'rlInent we re ready and to continue to devote this revenue /from nier2_]_ roy2.lties,7 to the improvern.ent of lands it did not OI',"n, there might be doubt 2.S to its leg-al au th or-I ty to 'Perform this function, wh i.ch !:light then not f211-within the scope of its coris t i tutional nowe r-s There are nLerrty of enemies of reclamation wh o would raise the Even silling . end Question test it, with states.40 40Eearinf,s, p. 33. grave danger to the in support of the case probably particularly im Dern's existing reclamation system was pressive to his audience due to the fact that -30, 1931, Utah was one of the very few states close balance between its yield of revenue to tion fund 'YJ.d its expenditures dr-awn from it. t!':e figures the statement wer-e of !r:. of June showing the a reclama Respectively, See and $6,751, 721. 06. Er-andjcr d Hearings,. PI" 259-61. $6,760,677.13 1. as , |
