| OCR Text |
Show 22 sO!:lething big. a sspicion even that the understood, Urb2Jli te And that it he wro te country-life was to reloc2.te as in 1911, , for "p::""esent popul2I D2.c1:-to-the-land 2.[;i tation" impulse stenl!:lL"'1.g from conge s t ed ca:pe an areas, realtors. f'r-om the cities to the f'ar'ms 2-fS2.inst it. rnerrt s are "The many VlayS they ci t::,. people vth2.t he argued, r2.ter, one, for potentially, 21 possible time, ment the "12.S that such coun+ry. how to if not The strongly move- in "but in t::'e held a the pp. convictions. &"'1 shift Lm- dilemma of belief that most farming desirable encouraging, at back-to-the-land movement. 1-2. '1:his country. deDoaphic the basic actually, that most opinion nation needed better farmers, 21Ibid., perversion distinction is convey the livelihoods without incipient t8.t the awful insisted, he deeply it underscores Bailey's position: was viewed any cautioned better life a of his most would be bad for the port&"'1.t Ee an did not conceal his find one es- , Bailey ir.. 12.ct, was, to ,,21 distinctly arrt agon i.s t i,o are v.ou Ld ur-ban and back-to-the-land country-life only little related," not But as and he the abetted by dubious L"':lpulse opportunistic of the country-life movement, an as dwe L'l.e r s city from prop2_g2..t.""1da eXodus desire of from the to 2.1')peal 211 !'eferred to the Ee country. betrayed being is- movement was beiq; mistaken in the he not the of same His argu nore famers, |
