| OCR Text |
Show 62 r,:issouri and has 100""a and not done us Illinois,'1 I,ondell concluded. good and any vre "He have not done hin any good.u38 Hov/Land posed to ondell's posed to his one of How12J1d's mar'ked that the His homestead. sinilar to those to have conclusions, premise the enlarging not sccns been renained but he sunp't i.ons solved bill, he the on op- by remarkably wer-e in the Senate. expressed by Heyburn final observations op- firmly could be problen as :?2.l"ticulal"ly In re- r more homes.that can be established on the nub lic comain te better for the countrv at lc.rre-and the nar t i cu Laz- Commonwe al th in which"" the h cne s te ad his bill, however, by doubling the is 16cate. acr-e age of the horne s t e ad entry J provides for on.Iy wou Ld be t2]-=en one-half as T:12DY hor.e s te ade r-s The ::owland then ience a predicted land rcnine, "should be e g5 present la\'l.)/ of under the C2.re to the that courrtz-y would asserted that the conserve the concept was simply conservation. of not a Only in Enlarged Homestead Act, reflected in Table 38-b" ..:Ll:.Q; 1. .. • J9Ibid., There, significant part the House 6096. was the This was in which voice in the :rouse debate a of roll as government was the the only given to in the Senate, the it opposition thought. call taken "sectional" ii,Tith the of exper- urged that 2nd resources," our n.Lar-ge d homestead bill be defeated. instance policy soon nature exception on the of which is of California's |
