OCR Text |
Show 110 CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE stand it-we have seen that breeds, known to have been derived from a common stock by selection, may be as different in their structure from the original stock as species may be distinct from each other. . But is the like true of the physiological characteristics of animals ? Do the physiological differences of varieties amount in degree to those observed between forms which naturalists call distinct species? This is a most important point for us to consider. As regards the great majority of physiological cha .. racteristics, there is no doubt that they are capable of being developed, increased, and modified by selection. There is no doubt that breeds may be made as .different as species in many physiological characters. I have already pointed out to you very briefly the different habits of the breeds of Pigeons, all of which depend upon their physiological peculiarities,-as the peculiar habit of tumbling, in the Tumbler,-the peculiarities of flight, in the a homing" birds,-the strange habit of spreading out the tail, and walking in a peculiar fashion, in the Fantail,--and, lastly, the habit of blowing out the gullet, so characteristic of the Pouter.· These are all due to physiological modification, and in ~ll these respects these birds differ as much from each other as any two ordinary species do. So with Dogs in their habits and instincts. It is a physiological peculiarity which leads the Greyhound to chase its prey by sight,-that enables the Beagle to track it by the scent,-that impels the Terrier to its rat-hunting propensity,-and that leads the Retriever to its habit of retrieving. These habits and instincts are all the results of physiological differences and pecu- PERPE'rUATION OJ<' 'LIVING BEINGS. Ill 1iarities, which have been developed from a common ·stock, at least there is every reason to believe so. But it is a most singular circumstance, that while you may run through almost the whole series of physiological processes, without finding a check to your argument, you come at last to a point where you do find a check, and that is in the reproductive processes. For there is a most singular circumstance in respect to natural species-at least about some of them-and it would be sufficient for the purposes of this argument, if it were true of only one of them, but there is, in fact, a great number of such cases-and that is, that similar as they may appear to be to mere races or breeds, they present a marked peculiarity in the reproductive process. If you breed from the male and female of the same race, you of course have offspring of the like kind, and if you make the offspring breed together, you obtain the same result, and if you breed from these again, you will still have the same kind of offspring; there is no check. But if you take members of two distinct species, however similar they may be to each other, and make them breed together, you will find a check, with some modifications and exceptions, however, which I shall speak of presently. If you cross two such species with each other, then,- although you may get offspring in the case of the first cross, yet, if you attempt to breed fro~ the products of that crossing, which are what are ca1led I-IYnRIDS- that is, if you couple a male and a female hybrid- then the result is that in ninety-nine cases out of a ln1ndreJ you will get no offspring at all: there will be no result whatsoever. |