| OCR Text |
Show 30 Karl Gordon Lark about that to you. She would do something she sent it to him. He would So it was science at had worked out. So 1 was .. a drop everything we they wanted me with Arber and I Anyway, a lot done. we came on expeditious I think one of the segregation was the other hand, at project. so well. It that I bit off more plants that I would be culture and we were working different institute. Between the two, a done. back and about that time-that would have been around the began working more and more the cells and so on, with plant cells garden that was looking initially at DNA replication in the plants, plant cells, at in that and excellent way, and that things plants, plant tissue began growing plants up behind the medical school, Eventually experiments group in Basel that worked with Cynthia did not get much 19-mid-80s-about that time I I a to work with Kellenberger, really didn't get and do the next she had results as soon as went there and this time in Basel it didn't work out than I could chew because I told there and experiment and distance done in the most know, just harder to work. .I don't an August 2015 making squashes up and then whole of plants and and plants. there, plants. things of this type. It wasn't terribly productive, I think. BBL: What brought KGL: The interest in about your interest in plants came up in bacteria more and more; it became we used were what we call they call a very question How did that orderly way. We come of using mutant bacteria. The mutant that at one particular protein that you're studying necessarily lethal. permissive temperature, up? rely on the whole with conditional mutants; they function well and if you raise the temperature the doesn't work, but it's not a a plants? temperature falls apart, You can grow the bacteria at the and then you can study effects at the right, what non-permissive temperature. So the kind of experiments, for example, with finishing the chromosome in 29 |
