| OCR Text |
Show 23 Karl Gordon Lark All of my journal clubs interested in show how this, and So I had done J erne's forte how are was in if you moved a were going to variations be on and combined them with methyl group were of the big things specificity come the idea that the antibodies naturally there already, stuff that the body made, very against them in weak, so from? saw the in so Proposed theories, antigen, some manner. and select them to go back and make much of what was known in chemistry to immunology was more the thing they J erne had proposed to find antibodies they were just part weak stimulate cells to make better ones, go back and forth explained was here, the antibody could tell essentially a Darwinian theory that the whole thing the antigen did was that that time immunology. immunology and one and folded up against, a lot of reading in antibodies made? Where did the primarily, were specificity of the antibodies specific they were: so on. assigned to me by somebody that was very at NYU. So I chose the work of Pauling, who at immunology very interested in the were August 2015 of a smoosh of of them and getting always better. This immunology, it was mind-boggling. It was wheeeee! For me, it was the second of such the cations and here I was shaking, not and general, problems, great mysteries experiences. seeing it with somebody specific like else who saw it in the by Burnet that in fact cells that made antibodies. So that instead of one cell better antibodies, was they selected better cells to be 22 own making something mine, but something that explained of biology, and I Later it became tweaked So the first had been my one with earth of the great making. they stimulated being made to replicated. making different make better and But the basic idea was |
