| OCR Text |
Show Karl Gordon Lark resignation, that was people. not not a by what 1 said, complaint the basic good because Shafer and it as you think you guy with are. this, he used along superbly, eventually, because it same it. Chamoffwas and not because he idea. That's very a was was because Chamoff said that said, "Look, saying. go up and kill this business that's He's everywhere unless going to tie a tin nonsense." That's what 1 went on important idea." to have Mexico. After 1 but mean a brilliant career and expected to have to going later he going to follow principals involved a can you and kill it." word of it; it's just he it, successfully, and University of New really wanted to come back, said, "Well, he made his bed, let him lie in years later. As 1 said, the senior faculty, whom something, 1 just didn't. They helped. 25 situation. 1 they're much better than they are. regretted it, was Then 1 called in Seattle with whatever this and went down to only confrontation that 1 had. confront on who think chair at the time and really just got along well. physically the 1 don't believe finally left it." 1 couldn't interfere with that. But that But that's the we Come on! And Chamoffwent and did stopped being chair, Sandy Parkinson was people was favor. We just teaching, anything that you to your tail that's understand, about and personal brought this up. you sort it out up there with all the And he did it. 1 said, "You have to "I have this can you're not Shafer and Shafer after office. 1 remember 1 want you to take time off from any sacrifice, and guy is department chairman's said somebody where he had been had accused him of stealing his stuff and Bill Shafer had Chamoff into my me why 1 prickly person, although we got going got along. He knew 1 respected him and he respected Part of it between theoretical was loyalty with Brown had August 2015 accusing him of stealing his work, was was nonsense ideas, everybody can have the 1 mean, nearly as good 30 It was actually a 1 |
