| OCR Text |
Show THIS IS AN INTERVIEW WITH KARL GORDON LARK ON AUGUST 30, 2015. THE INTERVIEWER IS BECKY B. LLOYD. THIS IS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ORAL HISTORY PROJECT. TAPE No. u-3335. THIS IS INTERVIEW FOUR. BBL: Today's date is August 30,2015. Lark. We want to start by talking We're continuing our interview with about the state of biology at the Gordon University of Utah when you arrived. KGL: When I in my opinion, arrived, biology at the lower campus, in terms of research and than out of date. It more a quarter of a century Darwin surge of finding out what species. There was few younger were a would get tenure, who knew what in it. As I think I mentioned not a students passing between anatomy, which which was was good, certainly Louis. But were was as and science of young science should be was as was a new house and people pathology, which really not very good, was so-so. already said, at the time I was It wasn't leaving clinical sciences and less basic science. So that a 1 st. and not that then from biochemistry, continuum of quality and it eight Louis, years earlier in st. most medical schools demanding an emphasis was and embracing. they moved through their education, they went at that time when I came, beginning to change with the applied medicine that very strange. It consisted of far below what I had been accustomed to seven, I had or good departments and, again, bad departments, and good departments, because very species I told them in my interview that this medical education very following the post- biology ought to be but were certainly not encouraged before, school, was, people that were teetering on whether or not they perhaps because they didn't know what that In the medical still the basis of selection for this certainly wasn't cultivating the home because it was thrust, unexpected. on an But the |
