| OCR Text |
Show 145 additional 4,341,378 net tons (1947 - 3, 763, 777 net tons) used were by establhhments classified in the primary, metals, industry group for the I production of certain fabricated (1947 net tons - 19,910, 304 One estimate figure included Western cent}, (11.3 Tables Z9 and 30 present per products The balance of ZZ, 797, Z98 apparent consumption of steel mill' during 1950 of 940,000 at 5,690,000 4, 110,000 net tons tons (16.5 per cent), net tons. Z9 (7Z. cent), 640,000 ports. 30 breakdown for two of the above classifications, a. Table Z3 shows the in the Western district and export of finished steel Z per and which arrived via water at Pacific Coast the writer. 31 prepared by of Z7 wet into various direct uses. Z8 production region net ton" steel the places rail movements into the as tons) net in the eleven Western States products This products. production 1950.3Z during products, except Data intercoastal of finished on the import shi.pments, was not available to the writer. However, it appears likely that 'such shipments apparently approximated figures estimates.33 It is Z7S.upra, . (Stanford of probable, shown in the Stanford Research Institute in view of the preceding discussion, Z8Supra, 138-139. pp. Z9 . the . p, that the 108.' . The Stanford Research Institute, University, 195Z), Section IV-C. 30This figure Western Resources Handbook includes intercoastal shipments of 8ZO, 000 tons, imports to Alaska of 90,000 tons, and other expoTts of 190,000 ton! 100,000 tons, exports 31Table Z9 contains the same classifications cited by the Stanford Re search Institute. It appears to the writer that the difference of &6, 47Z tons may have resulted fr the inclusion by Stanford of 86, 119 tons of pig iron (the net amount of such shipments originating in the eleven Western States during 1950) and the rounding off of their final figure. The 4Z, 83Z ton difference in 1950 inter coastal shfpmetrts was probably due to the fact that one set of figures was pre liminary, and the other final. See also Table 7, which shows com.parative inter coastal figures for 1951 3ZSupra, p. 98 The Stanford Research Institute figure is probably The total shown in Table Z3 was for "the Western correct. district,," and apparently included production in certain other states. • . 33S' nc t some variance. . e the f'a gur e s (See . were pre l'rrnrna ry also Footnote 31, , supra.) undoubtedly there would be |
