OCR Text |
Show __y__ Exhibit Iden. Evid. No. Page No. Page No. 2151 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 7, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Phipps (on page 5, line 24). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2152 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong, 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 7, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Phipps (on page 5, strike out lines 3 to 6). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2153 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 7, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Bratton (the Federal Power Commission). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2013* H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess, Senate, Dec. 7, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Bratton (on page 5, strike out). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 11,173 2154 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong, 2d Sess, Senate, Dec. 10, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (from the title of the bill). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2155 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong, 2d Sess, Senate, Dec. 10, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (on page 20 after line 20). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2156 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong, 2d Sess, Senate, Dec. 10, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (on page 12, line 6). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] ?Previously admitted in evidence. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |