OCR Text |
Show IN THE SUPREME COURT OP THE UNITED STATES October Term, 1957 No. 10 Original STATE OP ARIZONA, Complainant, v. STATE OP CALIFORNIA, PALO VERDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, IMPERIAI IRRIGATION DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, CITY OP LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OP SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, Defendants, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervener, STATE OF NEVADA, Intervener, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Impleaded, STATE OF UTAH, Impleaded. COMPLAINANT'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO APPEARANCE AND STATEMENT OF NEW MEXICO Complainant files Its Amended Reannnso to Appearance and Statement of New Mexico as follows: 1. As to paragraph 1^ complainant admits the allegations thereof. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |