OCR Text |
Show IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1957 NO. 10 ORIGINAL STATE OF ARIZONA, Complainant, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PALO VERDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, Defendants, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervener, STATE OF NEVADA, Intervener, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Impleaded, STATE OF UTAH, Impleaded. AMENDED BILL OF COMPLAINT The State of Arizona by leave of-Qoart-flles this amended bill of complaint and respectfully says: The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States. II In this behalf the complainant acts by and through the Arizona Interstate Stream Commission, an official state agency charged by statute with the duty and responsibility of prosecuting and defending all rights, claims and privileges of the state with respect to interstate streams, and by and through the Attorney General of the State of Arizona. Ill The defendants, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California are political subdivisions and agencies of the State of |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |