OCR Text |
Show IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 1957 No. 10 Original STATE OF ARIZONA, Complainant, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PALO VERDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Defendants UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervener STATE OF NEVADA, Intervener, STATE OF NEW MEXICO Impleaded, STATE OF UTAH Impleaded. Complainant's Amended Reply to California Defendants' Answer Complainant files its Amended Reply by-rts-du-ly-aatfroriBeel-a+terney-e, ref»±4e8 to the Answer of California defendants Defendants -herein as follows: |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |