| OCR Text |
Show IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, iyf>7 No. 10 Original STATE OF ARIZONA, Complainant, v. STATE OP CALIFORNIA, PALO VERDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, CITY OP LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, CLi'Y o:-' CAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA. Defendants, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervener, STATE OF NEVADA, Intervener, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Impleaded, STATE OF UTAH, Impleaded. Amended Answer to Petition of Intervention on Behalf of the State of Nevada Complainant, the State of Arizona, files its Amended AnawcF to the Petition of Entervcntion on Behalf of the State of Nevada, as foilowi": 1. |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
