Title |
1910 Utonian '10 junior year book |
Note |
The University of Utah has made former and current yearbooks from various campus entities available in print and via its digital library archive. These documents contain facts and milestones about the history of the University of Utah. In some cases, these publications contain insensitive and offensive language and imagery that does not represent the views or values of the University of Utah. Insensitive and offensive portrayals of race and gender were wrong at the time these publications were originally printed, and they are wrong today. The yearbooks are presented as they were originally created and have not been edited or censored-to do otherwise would be the same as claiming these prejudices and biases never existed. - July 2019 |
Subject |
College yearbooks; University of Utah--Periodicals |
Publisher |
Junior Class of the University of Utah |
Contributors |
Alley, James E. |
Date |
1909 |
Type |
Text |
Format |
application/pdf |
Digitization Specifications |
Originals scanned at 400ppi on an Epson Expression 1640XL flatbed scanner. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s, 800 pixels in width, 15 to 1 compression rate. |
Resource Identifier |
Utonian_1910 |
Source |
LD5538 .U8 1908/09 |
Source Physical Dimensions |
25 cm x 21 cm |
Language |
eng |
Relation |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States |
Coverage |
1908-1909 |
Rights Management |
Digital image copyright 2006, University of Utah. All rights reserved. |
Contributing Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States |
ARK |
ark:/87278/s6z038z6 |
Setname |
uum_utonian |
ID |
739820 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6z038z6 |
Title |
Page 105 |
OCR Text |
Show R. W. YOUNGE. H. BURGESSThe Years Work HOUGH the results in debating this year have not been startling, they have at least been satisfactory. We have held our own in this branch and have laid foundations for future teams. We look ahead with increased confidence to our forensic contests with the colleges of next year. This confidence comes from a realization of the increasing efficiency of our teams. The efficiency is the result of two factors; first, this year we have received an addition to the faculty in the form of a debating instructor; a teacher who can devote more time to the development and systematic training of the available debating material in our University. Next year we may expect to see greater results from his instruction; second, the system of choosing our 'Varsity teams adopted this year. Under this arrangement every man who has the inclination to enter this line has an excellent opportunity, without plunging into the finals first thing. The winners will receive more practice, the losers will have more training, and the University will be represented by stronger teams.Though we lost the debate with Boulder, it was by a narrow margin. The debate was a clean-cut contest and Boulder got the decision. That tells the story. The Utah-Oregon contest was also satisfactory. There was no quibbling; issues were presented and fairly met. Utah earned the decision and got it.The Colorado College-Utah debate, which at this date is yet to be held, bids fair to round out the season in a triumphant manner.( 105 ) |
Format |
application/pdf |
Resource Identifier |
105-UTON-1910_Page 105.tif |
Source |
Original Book: Utonian 1910 |
Setname |
uum_utonian |
ID |
739693 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6z038z6/739693 |