OCR Text |
Show G INTRODUCTION. riloua ~Titers, who denl. in wholesale abuse of Southern character, we have deemed unworthy of notice. Their writin'gs arc, no doubt, adapted to the taste of their readers; but aa it is certain that no educated gentleman will tolerate them, so we would not raise a £nger to promote their downfall, nor to arrest their course toward the oblivion ·which so inevitably awaits them. In replying to the others, we are conscious that we have often used strong language; for which, however, we have no apology to offer. We have dealt with their arguments and positions rather than with their motives and characters. If, in pursuing this course, we have often spoken strongly, we merely beg the reader to consider whether we have not also spoken justly. We have certainly net spoken without provocation. For even these men-the very light,s and ornaments of abolitionism- have seldom condescended to argue the great question of Liberty and Slavery with us as with equals. On the contrary, they habitually address us as if nothing but a purblind ignorance of the very first elements of moral flcicnce could shield our minds against the force of their irresistible arguments. In the overflowing exuberance of their philanthropy, they take pity of our most lamentable moral darkness, and graciously condescend to teach us the very A B C of ethical philosophy! lienee, 1f we h:we dcP.med it n. duty to INTRODUCT.ION. 7 lay baro their pompous inanities, showing them to be no oracles, and to strip their pitiful sophisms of the guise of a profound philosophy, we trust that no impartial reader will take offence at such vindication of the South against her accusers and despisers. In this vindication, we have been careful throughout to distinguish between the abolitionists, our accusers, and the great body of the people of the North. Against these wo have said nothing, and we could say nothing; since for these we entertain the most profound respect. We have only assailed those by whom we have been assailed; and we have held each and every man responsible only for what he himself has said and done. We should, indeed, despise ourselves if we could be guilty of the monstrous injustice of denouncing a whole people on account of the sayings and doings of a portion of them. We had infinitely rather suffer such injustice-as we have so long done-than practise it toward others. We cannot flatter ourselves, of course, that the following work is without errors. But these, whatever else may bo thought of them, arc Ilot the errors of haste nod inconsideration. For if we have felt deeply on the subject here discussed, we .have also thought long, and patiently endeavored to guard our minds against fallacy. How far this effort has proved successful, it is the province of the candid and impartial reader alone to decide. If our arguments and views |