| OCR Text |
Show 220 question the low that it This low grouped statistics. produced ranking the completed those who an lowering last unit ranked of 'VIas r ev i.ew illusion b ecaus e , regrettably, by utilizing only one the statistics high, perhaps the fully participated highest, in it. density experiment; resulted.. either high By using between unit low ranking insignificant, or ranking matrix, a components was method tain statistical improve to maximum a obtained. materials, the course. and intended to to exemplify curriculum External different ations all ; the component rankings degree of differentiation to quality the poorer material until to the best, was it good one pre theoretically average The equally upgraded. This then repeat. cycle of curriculum test device that could be was helpful and instructors. Comparisons riculums, d Lf f e r Other and their could between differing curriculums degree the curriculums the ratings school activities Designing material simple yet useful specialists Comparisons to a the cer- entire class would reequilibrium judged by Although individual students prefer ferences when the materials became redesign the reality, wh.i.ch indicated few weaknesses. insignificance compared the the five hydrographing activity standards, then, after ranking, upgrading achieved as In Similarlys the were so students many of two or the rest. on interfered with the completion of a unit: however, ranked negative correlation with its total ranking. last unit thus methods a The the fit serve are similar purposes. useful, Different teaching styles, different student needs Because somewhat different situations. judgments suffer. Neverthelessz a but the or only cur expect criteria certain degree of uni- |
