Title |
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : report / Simon H. Rifkind, special master |
Creator |
United States. Supreme Court |
Subject |
Water rights; Water consumption; Rivers |
OCR Text |
Show The record of this action is another chapter in the long history of controversy relating to the Colorado River. Suit was initiated by Arizona on August 13, 1952, by filing a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint against the State of California and seven public agencies of the State.1 On January 19, 1953, the motion, unopposed, was granted. |
Publisher |
[Washington, D.C. : U.S. Supreme Court, 1960] |
Contributors |
Rifkind, Simon H. |
Date |
1960-12-05 |
Type |
Text |
Format |
application/pdf |
Digitization Specifications |
Image files generated by Photoshop CS from PDF files |
Language |
eng |
Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2004, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
Holding Institution |
UNLV Libraries, Special Collection, 4505 Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 |
Source Physical Dimensions |
ix, 433 p. ; 27 cm |
Call Number |
KFA2847.5.C6 A337 1960 |
ARK |
ark:/87278/s61835d5 |
Setname |
wwdl_azvca |
ID |
1120114 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s61835d5 |
Title |
page 363 |
OCR Text |
Show 363 Appendix 1 PLEADINGS, BRIEFS, AND ORDERS OF THE COURT Filing Date 1952 August 13 October 13 December 8 December 31 1953 January 19 February 10 March 4 March 16 May 19 May 20 Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint and Bill of Complaint. Rule Ordered to Issue, Returnable Within 60 days, Requiring Defendants to Show Cause Why Leave to File Bill of Complaint Should Not Be Granted. 344 U. S. 806. Return of Defendants to Rule to Show Cause and Brief in Support of Return. Motion on Behalf of the United States for Leave to Intervene and Brief in Support of Motion. Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint Granted and Process Ordered to Issue, Returnable Within 60 Days. Motion of United States for Leave to Intervene Granted. 344 U. S. 919. Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene. Complainant's Objections to Motion on Behalf of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to File Petition to Intervene. Motion of Sidney Kartus et al. for Leave to Intervene Denied. 345 U. S. 914. Answer of Defendants to Bill of Complaint. Motion of Colter Water Project Assn., Inc., for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae. |
Format |
application/pdf |
Source |
Original Report: State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California |
Resource Identifier |
375-UUM-COvAZ-SMRP_page 363.jpg |
Setname |
wwdl_azvca |
ID |
1119675 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s61835d5/1119675 |