Title |
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : report / Simon H. Rifkind, special master |
Creator |
United States. Supreme Court |
Subject |
Water rights; Water consumption; Rivers |
OCR Text |
Show The record of this action is another chapter in the long history of controversy relating to the Colorado River. Suit was initiated by Arizona on August 13, 1952, by filing a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint against the State of California and seven public agencies of the State.1 On January 19, 1953, the motion, unopposed, was granted. |
Publisher |
[Washington, D.C. : U.S. Supreme Court, 1960] |
Contributors |
Rifkind, Simon H. |
Date |
1960-12-05 |
Type |
Text |
Format |
application/pdf |
Digitization Specifications |
Image files generated by Photoshop CS from PDF files |
Language |
eng |
Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2004, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
Holding Institution |
UNLV Libraries, Special Collection, 4505 Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 |
Source Physical Dimensions |
ix, 433 p. ; 27 cm |
Call Number |
KFA2847.5.C6 A337 1960 |
ARK |
ark:/87278/s61835d5 |
Setname |
wwdl_azvca |
ID |
1120114 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s61835d5 |
Title |
table-of-contents |
OCR Text |
Show TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE PAGE I. Introductory Statement of the Case___ 1 II. Prior Litigation....................... 7 III. Geography of the Colorado River Basin .. 9 IV. History of the Colorado River......___ 15 V. Major Works in the Lower Basin....... 32 A. Mainstream Works ................. 32 1. Hoover Dam.................... 32 2. Davis Dam ...................... 33 3. Parker Dam..................... 33 4. Headgate Rock Dam.............. 34 5. Palo Verde Weir.................. 35 6. Imperial Dam.................... 35 7. Laguna Dam .................... 36 8. Morelos Dam..................... 36 9. All-American Canal System........ 36 10. Coachella Canal .................. 38 11. Colorado River Aqueduct.......... 38 B. Gila River System Works............ 39 1. Coolidge Dam.................... 39 2. Ashurst-Hayden Dam............. 39 3. Buckeye Dam.................... 40 4. Painted Rock Dam................ 40 |
Format |
application/pdf |
Source |
Original Report: State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California |
Resource Identifier |
002-UUM-COvAZ-SMRP_table-of-contents.jpg |
Setname |
wwdl_azvca |
ID |
1119665 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s61835d5/1119665 |