| OCR Text |
Show 23 questions aloud. The viewer marked answer not were data Each researcher was The area. in used in analyzing and III. the chi-square This the of the processed neighborhood sample. schedule inter the computation. the participating included. Handling used for given identifying information regarding families his given orally, and was preserve confidentiality, names,' addresses and To other the answer Data the Much of the description test for two collected from data data of from Part I the responses to the questions was appropriate inasmuch categories, greater and lesser the hypotheses two independent groups. the observed value of The neighborliness, tested null chi-square concerned was such are was that inde rejected the II two comparison a hypothesis was in Parts the as the the independent samples test pendent; and in people of of if probability associated' with its occurrence under equal to or than 5 per with degree A tw6-tailed region of rejection wa one greater appropriate predicted. The of freedom income. cent socio-economic level in the criteri of c ompu t.ed level hypothesis of each significance was not neighborhood was The correlation between the degree of • was educational attainment liness and the socio-economic level in was null since the direction'of the difference established by using and the the the five neighboTl neighborhoods |
