| OCR Text |
Show 12 the Assuming MacLeod viously suggested, best 2 behaviors.l, Like physical proximity, and interests. and Bell positive a and Bernard similar those comprehend is experience in and that people pre can interests they indicate and that personal characteristics of identification easy as intelligence, Boat, similarity agree one, tbe on basis of per- ceptual characteristics favor group formation and influence the choice and unconscious of specific neighborhoods as he writes of occupational church or levels.3 that of but not area to families in new common He that usefulness munity it idea is not trade of of conscious inasmuch to values similarity such that as the estates has resulted and in employment experience. the neighborhood commensurate with the kind of COffi- popularity enjoys.5 lRobert Psychology, 1954), p. ad. 216. B. Macleod, "Social Psychology," Areas of F. L. Marcuse (New York: Harper and Bros., 2Bernard, p. 221. 3Wendell Bell and Marion D. Boat, Social Relations," American and Informal LXII, No.4 (January, 1957), 391. 4Robin in related Dennis writes housing with few the are similarity affiliations.4 inhabitants concludes does not agree friendship choices political dispersion Williams both the on a Suburban (1959), 8. M. "Urban Neighborhoods Journal of Sociology, Williams, Jr., "Friendship and Social Values Pacific Sociological Review, II Community," 5Norman Dennis, "The Popularity of the Neighborhood Community Idea," Sociological Review, VI, No.2 (December, 1958), 191-206. |
