| OCR Text |
Show 17 is great that direct evaluation of the models from simple experi so unlikely. is ments All of the models the models to due is primarily considerations of complete theory work to was apply was surfacs-coupled Wooldridge [53] allow for essentially same Their analysis was of unstable as used rationalize to [8] develop similar curve sources. Their result in a and effort to attempted Marxman and results of and variables. pressurization tend to sources Brown, Huzzy and Stienle apply it to T-burner response rationalize the shift in the response principal thesis is that since by Culick [15], a nearly all analysis two-parameter equation for the response function, one need only to linearized pyrolysis law and as determine these parameters for presented by Krier, T'ien, Sirignano, includes and reactions and present the the response function is established model combustion. their additives supposedly modify the interfacial thermal energy, as claimed analysis relatively Since approach where interfacial extinguishment boundary. an A recent, representing eight independent determine the functions in in Denison and Baum via transformations depressurization experiments a their adapted surface-coupled result three parameters, into and the reactions. given by Denison and Baum [23]. similar types to phase differences in the gas phase model and to others have presented, it the solid treat The differences which exist between the various manner. same previously developed an all and conditions. Summerfield improved gas The [48] phase model. |
