| OCR Text |
Show 60 normoconvective trial. elevation rate sweat the in 1209.51 (M with (M literature 1984) verifying sweat rate will skin when cooling, and 8.55 mean entire was 2.57 more 35.09 (M when of to steady room state the periphery to core gradients 90 11.12 °c air was minute over trial whereas minutes of the normoconvective trial slightly during (see Figure 3) with comparison revealing significance only exercise the to This reflects compared After the compared circulation from 23.97°C). (M higher in as 32.52°C). (M blood °C) evidenced by thermal as hyperconvective influence earlier to temperature skin temperature dropped versus leading possible overheating. °c Wenger, is hindered, loss heat & skin temperature remained consistent throughout attained, the Gisolfi 1989; evaporative °c, respectively, temperature al., This agrees and hyperconvective trial for mL*m-2*hr-1). tissues normoconvective trial redirection of et (Adams hyperconvective the to substantially increase, the of dehydration Mean that 504.56 total higher a mL*m-2*hr-1) during 619.47 compared as mL*hr-1, 985.63 other mL*hr-1, trial the hypothalamic control, internal temperature stimulated normoconvective trial Under Because 15. the contrast between minute temperature core the has a major skin blood flow and skin temperature & (Johnson with temperature a Park, rising normoconvective trial 1979), stabilization of internal temperature suggests that peripheral 0 during skin during blood the flow |
