| OCR Text |
Show 47 Evaporative between total sweat sweat determined to be rate min-1 in the 1118.50 mL*hr-1 normoconvective the 75.09 trials, a significant The + 3.80%) 98.73 + .50%). sweat minutes) the shorts heat and amounted to hyperconvective trial, and 385.57 the higher (R .001) W*m-2) as no sweat et in the compared signi was + + 50.56 al., 1969), 6. W*m-2 in < the the the of 90 in Evaporative the normo the .003) difference driven by wind mean was skin and ambient significantly hyperconvective trial to (M to accumulation W*m-2 in significant (R loss, 1.27% (19.38 grn in in Table 41.73 (M trial dripped the sweat difference between (Mitchell +6.83 a 145.80 hyperconvective listed are Convective heat temperature < the subject. loss of evaporated the data velocity that by transfer W*m-2• sweat to Heat 50.3 difference due worn mL*hr-1 in the normoconvective trial convective trial and 335.27 of .001) to to hyperconvective entirely socks grn*90 equivalent 144.55 did not evaporate that was mL*m-2*hr-1) during + the 222.46 + was hyperconvective trial, almost was 972.70 essentially Because rate of compared as the ground during < lower .001) 92.76 total (R percentage < and This rate, in the 1657.29 61.98 + mL*m-2*hr-1) during (497.93 ficantly (R trial. (572.62 trials + mL*hr-1• to difference sweat grn*90 min-1 compared as the as nonevaporated 200.37 + hyperconvective 126.98 + and 1885.15 normoconvective trial calculated loss, (M normoconvective trial 54.26 (M |
