| Title |
State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants : the United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of Utah and State of New Mexico, impleaded defendants : report / Simon H. Rifkind, special master |
| Creator |
United States. Supreme Court |
| Subject |
Water rights; Water consumption; Rivers |
| OCR Text |
Show The record of this action is another chapter in the long history of controversy relating to the Colorado River. Suit was initiated by Arizona on August 13, 1952, by filing a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint against the State of California and seven public agencies of the State.1 On January 19, 1953, the motion, unopposed, was granted. |
| Publisher |
[Washington, D.C. : U.S. Supreme Court, 1960] |
| Contributors |
Rifkind, Simon H. |
| Date |
1960-12-05 |
| Type |
Text |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Digitization Specifications |
Image files generated by Photoshop CS from PDF files |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2004, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
UNLV Libraries, Special Collection, 4505 Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 |
| Source Physical Dimensions |
ix, 433 p. ; 27 cm |
| Call Number |
KFA2847.5.C6 A337 1960 |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s61835d5 |
| Setname |
wwdl_azvca |
| ID |
1120114 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s61835d5 |
| Title |
table-of-contents-page ii |
| OCR Text |
Show 11 PAGE 5. Roosevelt Dam................... 40 6. Horse Mesa Dam................. 40 7. Mormon Flat Dam................ 41 8. Stewart Mountain Dam............ 41 9. Granite Reef Diversion Dam....... 42 10. Cave Creek Dam.................. 42 11. Horseshoe Dam..............___ 42 12. Bartlett Dam..................... 43 13. Carl Pleasant Dam................ 43 C. Operation of Works on the Mainstream-River Control.............. 43 VI. Irrigation Projects and Districts, Indian Reservations and Other Water Users in the Lower Basin....................... 45 A. Arizona............................ 45 1. Salt River Project................ 45 2. Roosevelt Irrigation District........ 46 3. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1........ 47 4. San Carlos Project......j*......... 48 5. Yuma Area...................... 50 (a) Yuma Project-Valley Division . 50 (b) Gila Project................. 51 (i) North Gila Valley Irrigation District ............ 51 (ii) Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District___ 52 (iii) Yuma-Mesa Irrigation and Drainage District........ 52 |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Source |
Original Report: State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California |
| Resource Identifier |
003-UUM-COvAZ-SMRP_table-of-contents-page ii.jpg |
| Setname |
wwdl_azvca |
| ID |
1119666 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s61835d5/1119666 |
