OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 2710 Identification:.................... Admitted: May 12, 1958 Tr. 16,964 Interrogatory No. 6 of Interrogatories Addressed to the intervener, the state of nevada, by the California Defendants, Dated March 13, 1956; the Answer Dated April 2, 1956. 6. Do the Nevada claims include the use of water for other federal purposes, including the National Park Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, fish and wildlife refuges? If so, in what amounts and at what places of use? March 13, 1956 6. Answer: No. 6. The Nevada claims presently include only the use of the return flow in the Muddy River, if any, by the National Park Service in conjunction with the Nevada State Fish and Game Commission in the vicinity of the high-water mark of Lake Mead of an estimated 1,487 acre-feet per annum. April 2, 1956 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |