OCR Text |
Show ITEM Average annual benefits (100 years @ 2x/2%) Average annual cost (100 years @ 2y2%) Benefit-cost ratio Amortization Capacity (Per acre) Net power Revenues same for both Reports Annual Repayment by irrigators Annual irrigation repayment per acre ^Computed by CRB. 7Average annual benefits: Irrigation, Direct " , Indirect , Total Power Flood Control Sediment Control Fish and Wildlife Recreation Total *Power Benefits: Direct Indirect Total 1949 Report $2,361,2607 965,600 2.45 to 1.00 $6.39 $109,000 $4.826 1949 Report $ 809,630 925,330 $1,734,960 550,200* 9,000 26,600 26,000 14,500 $2,361,260 $ 355,600 194,600 $ 550,200 1953 Report $1,624,0007 1,034,000 1.57 to 1.00 $5.89 $221,000 a year $86,000 $5.326 1953 Report $ 507,000 458,000 $ 965,000 615,000* 13,000 31,000 $1,624,000 $ 386,000 229,000 $ 615,000 Difference1 -$737,260 + 68,400 -0.88 -0.50 -$23,000 +0.50 Reference Par. 53 (1949); Par. 58 (1953) Par. 54 (1949) ; Par. 61 (1953) Par. 54 (1949) ; Par. 62 (1953) Par. 58 (1949) ; Par. 65 (1953) Par. 58 (1949) ; Par. 65 (1953) |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |