OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 3047 Identification: July 15, 1958 Tr. 19,845 Admitted: July 15, 1958 Tr. 19,860 COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY REQUIRED OF IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT PER ARIZONA EXHIBITS 426 AND 428 WITH EFFICIENCY REQUIRED OF CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT PER ARIZONA EXHIBITS 65 AND 65-A Required Efficiencies, Imperial Per Arizona Exhibits 426, 428 DIVERTED 1. Total surface water diverted, acre-feet (PI. Ex. 428, line 12 less line 2) Per acre (1,909,000 -=- 475,000) AT FARMS 5. Delivered to farms, acre-feet (PL Ex. 426, line 11) Per acre (PI. Ex. 426, line 9) 6. Ratio of quantities delivered at farms to quantities delivered at Drop 1 (3.52 - 3.94) 7. Ratio of quantities delivered at farms to quantity diverted (3.52 -s- 4) 1,909,600 4 PROJECT 2. Delivered at Drop 1, acre-feet 1,869,700 HEADGATE (PL Ex. 426, line 27) 3.94 Per acre (PL Ex. 426, line 28) 3. Ratio of quantity delivered at Drop 1 to quantity diverted 98|% BELOW 4. (a) Canal and lateral losses and HEADGATE system regulatory waste below Drop 1, acre-feet 164,100 (PL Ex. 426, lines 25 and 26) (b) Losses in per cent of quantity at Drop 1 8.8% (c) Losses below Drop 1, acre-feet per acre .34 1,670,600 3.52 89% 88% Efficiencies, Central Arizona Project Area (Per "Red Book" : Present Ariz. Ex. Nos. 65, 65-A)_______ (Table B-5) DIVERTED 1. Total surface water acre-feet 1,676,600 (2,758,600 + 200,000 aqueduct loss) Per acre (1,676,600-297,300) 5.7 (2,958,600 -=- 485,000) DISTRICT 2. Delivered at project HEADGATE headgate, acre-feet 1,676,600 Per acre 5.7 (2,758,600 - 485,000) 3. Ratio of quantity delivered at district headgate to quantity diverted 100% BELOW 4. (a) Canal and lateral losses DISTRICT below headgate, acre-feet HEADGATE (30% x 1,676,600) 503,000 (30% x 2,758,600) (b) Losses in per cent of quantity at headgate 30% (c) Losses below District headgate, acre-feet per acre 1.7 AT FARMS 5. Delivered to farms, acre-feet (4 x 297,300) 1,189,200 (4 x 485,000) Per acre 4 6. Ratio of quantities delivered at farms to quantities delivered at project headgate (4 + 5.7) 70% 7. Ratios of quantities delivered at farms to quantities diverted (4-5.7) 70% (4-6.1) Ultimate (Table B-23) 2,958,600 6.1 2,758,600 5.7 93% 827,600 30% 1.7 1,940,000 4 70% 66% |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |