Title |
War for the Colorado River Volume II; Above Lee's Ferry |
Creator |
Terrell, John Upton |
Subject |
Water rights; Water resources development; Water resources development -- Law and legislation; Rivers |
OCR Text |
Two volumes describing the California-Arizona controversy over the Colorado River. Part One - Hungry Horse Prediction; Part Two - January on Capitol Hill; Part Three - The Ides of March; Part Four - A Stacked Committee; Part Five - Hi Ho, Aqualantes; Part Six - Bananas on Pike's Peak; Part Seven - Dollars into Dust |
Publisher |
The Arthur H. Clark Company |
Date |
1966 |
Type |
Text |
Format |
application/pdf |
Digitization Specifications |
Pages were scanned at 400 ppi on Fujitsu fi-5650C sheetfed scanner as 8-bit grayscale or 24-bit RGB uncompressed TIFF images. For ContentDM access the images were resampled to 750 pixels wide and 120 dpi and saved as JPEG (level 8) in PhotoShop CS with Unsharp Mask of 100/.3. Foldout pages larger than 11" x 14" were captured using a BetterLight Super 8K-2 digital camera back on a 4x5 view camera (100mm Schneider APO lens). Oversize images were resampled to 1500 pixels wide. Optical Character Recognition (OCR) by ABBYY FineReader 7.0 with manual review. |
Language |
eng |
Relation |
Western Waters Digitial Library |
Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2005, Marriott Library, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
Source Physical Dimensions |
Book 2 v. maps. 24 cm. |
Scanning Technician |
Backstage Library Works - 1180 S. 800 E. Orem, UT 84097. |
Call Number |
LC: KF5590.C6 |
ARK |
ark:/87278/s64t6h83 |
Setname |
wwdl_books |
ID |
1130135 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s64t6h83 |
Title |
page 010 |
OCR Text |
10 WAR FOR THE COLORADO RIVER ment - inadequately called the Colorado River Storage Project - had been completed in 1950. He must have known that not only Democrats but powerful Republi- can members of Congress were its sponsors. When he left office the crsp was ready to be hatched in the legislative nest. Nothing short of an atom bomb on Capitol Hill could have prevented Congress from con- sidering it. To understand the war over the crsp one must under- stand something of the basic issues which caused it. The original Colorado River Compact, formulated in 1922, divided the water between the Upper and Lower Basins of the river, but not between the individual states. It was presumed that the states in each basin would negotiate their own agreements by which the waters allotted to each basin would be equably divided. That did not happen. The Lower Basin states of California, Arizona and Nevada were never able to agree, and in 1953 their controversy was taken to the United States Supreme Court for an adjudication of their claims. Almost twenty-six years passed before the Upper Basin states of Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico and Arizona reached an understanding, and on October 11, 1948, signed an Upper Basin Compact.2 Congress approved it the following year.* The original Compact apportioned waters "for bene- * The dividing line between the Upper and Lower Basins was at Lee's Ferry, Ari- zona. Because a tiny portion of Arizona's border reached above that point, Ari- zona was both a Lower and Upper Basin state, thus was entitled to be a signer of the Upper Basin Compact. |
Format |
application/pdf |
Identifier |
012-UUM-WarColo2_page 010.jpg |
Source |
Original Book: War for the Colorado River, Vol. 1 |
Setname |
wwdl_books |
ID |
1129822 |
Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s64t6h83/1129822 |