OCR Text |
Show 472 REOAPITUI.. . ATION • CHAP. XIV. species constantly trying to increase in number, with natural selection always ready to adapt the slowly varying descendants of each to any unoccupied or ill-occu. Pied place in nature, these facts c~a~e to be strange, or perhaps might even have been antiCipat~~· . As natural selection acts by competition, It adapts the inhabitants of each country only in relation to the degree of perfection of their _assoc~ates ; so that we need feel no surprise at the Inhabitants of any one country, although on the ordinary view supposed to have been specially created and adapted for that country, being beaten and supplanted by the naturalised productions from another land. Nor ought we to marvel if all the contrivances in nature be not, as far as we can judge, absolutely perfect; and if some of them be abhorrent to our ideas of fitness. We need not marvel at the sting of the bee causing the bee's own death; at drones being produced in such vast numbers for one single act, and being then slaughtered by their sterile sisters ; at the astonishing waste of pollen by our firtrees; at the instinctive hatred of the queen bee for her own fertile daughters ; at ichneumonidoo feeding within the live bodies of caterpillars; and at other such cases. The wonder indeed is, on the theory of natural selection, that more cases of the want of absolute perfection have not b en observed. The complex and little known laws gove:rning variation are the same, as far as we can see, with the l~ws which have aoverned the production of so-called specific forms. In both cases physical conditions seem to .ha.ve produced but little direct effect ; yet when vanet1es enter any zone, they occasionally a sume some of the characters of the species proper to that zone. In both varieties and species, use and disuse seem ~o ha~e produced some effect ; for it is difficult to resist this con- PHAP, XIV. RECAPITULATION. 473 clu~ion w~en we loo~{, for. instance, at the logger-headed duck, whiCh h~~ Wing~ Incapable of flight, in nearly the same condition as 1n the domestic duck ; or when w~ look at the burrowin~ tucutucu, which is occasionally bhnd, and then at certain moles, which are habitually blind and have their eyes covered with skin; or when we look at the blind animals inhabiting the dark caves of America and Europe. In both varieties and species correlation of growth seems to have played a most important part, so that when one part has been modified other parts are necessarily modified. In both varieties and species reversions to long-lost characters occur. How inexplicable on the theory of creation is the occasional appearance of stripes on the shoulder and legs of the several species of the horse-genus and in their hybrids! How simply is tlus fact explained if we believe that these species have descended from a striped progenitor, in the same manner as the several domestic breeds of pigeon have descended from the blue and barred rock-pigeon ! On the ordinary view of each species having been independently created, why should the specific characters, or those by which the species of the same genus differ from each other, be more variable than the generic characters in which they all agree? Why, for instance, should the colour of a :Bower be more likely to vary in any one species of a genus, if the other species, supposed to have been created independently, have differently coloured :Bowers, than if all the species of the genus have the same coloured flowers? If specie:.; are only well-marked varieties, of which the characters have become in a high degree permanent, we can understand this fact ; for they have already varied since they branched off from a common progenitor in certain characters, by which they have come to be specifically distinct from each other |