| OCR Text |
Show _"" , Subsequent to reviewed the :II the analysis arguments or the thl"'ee, or of' integr1ty stU('Y the $.rrlt thle Qf, both Pratt and Nt1lfmnn from In ·the ttuu1' proper the tech,n1aUfHJ {. . . ' employed were' thotac of thm 'tradl t1ona.,1 rheto.r10 an(l 10g10 both of whloh stem in llu"ge part ref)orted 1n, th#,&$fIl! 'r,.-gt8 based on the dlat1notlon \ithl0h 1s r,nade in modf)rn WA from Arleto tie. lQgI0 btwe(tn tltnal;ytlg 'The ane.1YB1 nd, faotus]. sentenoes. ,;1, AI fr as the wr1ter 1A Ahle to has not <H1H,up1ed i.he mm' he 1 of the this $Qrt· of am.lyer.19 tttth.tlon of et'udnnts of' ),ub110 speaking Q'lnl0n that t:;lloh lana.IYAle tk"e lnter'81!'tlng ramifications not only for ftS fUseover, the Qrltl(l'but for the pl''aat101oner TltlL. The latlnotlon between sentenoes 11 pointed out by analytic Rnd t8tal Feigl who states; Thua 1n a g'$nt!)r'a.l ol.aju1flo$t1,on of sen tene es !fn. exprAs1Qn we <ilstingulatt tod.n,y (1) Log1c9.11y true sentenoes. _lao o11ed rinalytlo aentenoes. () Log1oal1y r"lme sentenoea, lso· called oontrt:t(Uot1onB. . Thele, $entnoel ,are tru or raloe, r'ep(!otlvfJly, by v.1rtue of th61r f0rm EVen it desoriptive emn1rlcal tGrm ae conta1nd lnth.m they funotion onl • vacuously', al'Hl t,hel r feo tUlll refers" 08 18 lrre lvant o the validity ot th 8.nt.nce '() 'aotually true nd (4) 'faotually fals'e $entencea WhO$8 v':l11dlty depends upon t,hF!l r Qorre spond enC:HJ to ol?erved r ao t. In tn, mJorl'ty of l.ns t&n.ees tn1 s oorresl>ondenoe or non-correspond_noe is only incompletely and lndlroctly lndlotii ted by lrd:"'... tf!vftr 1n lfmre{.U)tely obsuu'Vable. Thf.trrore th$e sent enc e s are uu9:11y 'not ltOQWO to be true or frAIse but r,e conide're,d to be con1'lrme;::I or d1eoonf 1rmcd to an extent rlhllJh m1 vary oonslder,bly •. , . 110 ;,. t_.... .. l, ..... APi'ENDIX l'rattt $ 1deae fotu"ll:' in ohApter has _..-.....-, ... w ..... _.r |
