| OCR Text |
Show 106 ,Neftlmtlm' Debat. rGve,.nled, that l>:rtttt r,elled prlroar1.ly logical mode ot peruasl0.n.' tthlo,l proof but em,ployed He the on twlo'ana pathet10 proof only .1% tlmee,aq oopared to the of nln ,teen ln no. ot, hla" thre $peeohe. use argumentAtive d.evelop IU", method or .... ment W1U', to ,by .. attempted He, tl:r,t prlmar11y deduc1"e-1nduot1'¥.. e stAt,hl1nh in the ,course ,of logical pro f or de'duot1 v,e arg'umen ts tha't oertain means epeoflo PM_sages 1n the accepted uthorlty for the debate (the ,Bible) on from polygamy. the d.edu(lt.1ve pa ttern Qr sanc t t ens r were eatabllah1ng hi. proof-texts $poo1fl0 1nlMt;,:inoe authority" sour-e e His prlWtry the Bible and hll Ol-!n proot-textfJ hlah htl teAtlmoriy'l ad'tneed in hie oonstruotlve 01 ts.'t1Qn tro,m the NeW' Tostament s I:)l'oof tttxt e" ... tions whioh he uuertet1_ cQnoernl,ng the t1 !H!Ul ftl'f) modern blbl1ol1 or .verbal tallacl$'R but did, eonun1t were ns tur e 'f-loho lrg. o.onAldered by ,: (3) no The proposi t;ln{ extent H, c,ommi tted meven matertal no of forma,l ,r$.11o1es. thA t·'r1 ter to b &l t:9PylYiJ but whioh migbt be' cons1t'ered by 1 egl t1m,a te use of c$.}.rne, sup"')orted Ul correot by competent three of whioh ease :Hg employed xceptlon8. from th. PeDtateuoh polygamy in blbl1e1 of Ttl9 eleven with tvo , ncl I . / he deviate in one OaBe ·he argufUJ, from in the other OfUHt fNHn ev1deno$ tl't the' B1ble 8fil e. 1ilhole orlly two lnatancea did In gen4,f'11zed He then po118,amy. inmtanoee' the bnf.1ie ot these sanotione at sanot1on" ot -ere o the r-s f!rp:'umntum to be 'p}Jlt'hetto proof. Hl, pr1nolpe.l refutat1v te·ohnlquee turning th6 tablee, r§uqi,10 EM1,8,bflYr(14.f!l, ll.nd 'l:rere exposing |
