OCR Text |
Show JOllnllJl of Clinical Neurcrophthalmology 10( 3): 159- 166, 1990. Mitochondrial Mutations in Neuro- ophthalmological Diseases A Review Michael A. Morris, D. phil. © 1990 Raven Press, Ltd., New York Mutations in the genetic material of mitochondria have been described in patients with a range of neuroophthalmological and neuromuscular disorders. Many cases of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy are caused by a single point mutation, for example, and KearnsSayre syndrome, chronic external ophthalmoplegia, and other mitochondrial cytopathies are frequently associated with large- scale deletions of mitochondrial genes. A knowledge of the role of the mitochondrial genome and of the precise nature of these mutations is important in understanding the etiology of such diseases and is already leading to more effective therapy. Key Words: Mitochondrial DNA- Mitochondrial mutations- Mitochondrial cytopathy- Kearns- Sayre syndrome- Progressive external ophthalmoplegia- Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy- Maternal inheritance. From the Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre, Geneva, Switzerland. Address correspondence and reprint r~ que~ ts to Dr. M. A. Morris, Institute of Medical Genetics, UniversIty MedIcal Centre, 9, avenue de Champel, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. 159 Mitochondria are rod- shaped organelles ( the name comes from the Greek for " thread- shaped granule") found in the cytoplasm of most eukaryotic cells ( the exceptions are found among protozoa and fungi) ( 1). They have been called the " power plants of aerobic cells" ( 2) because they are the sole site of the respiratory chain and they are responsible for providing the great majority of the energy used by the body. Uniquely among animal organelles, mitochondria contain their own genome, a small, circular chromosome carrying 37 genes essential to our survival. Why do mitochondria have these genes, and what is their relevance to neuro- ophthalmology? THE RESPIRATORY CHAIN Living organisms need energy- a lot of it. Throughout life on Earth, from the archaebacteria to the mammals, this energy has been obtained principally by the hydrolysis of the so- called " high- energy phosphate bonds" of adenosine triphosphate ( ATP), releasing adenosine diphosphate ( ADP), inorganic phosphate ( Pi), and free energy, which is used by the systems of the body for growth, maintenance, and useful work. Adenosine triphosphate is not used for energy storage, however; it must be continually produced to meet the demands of the organism. In an average mammalian cell, an ATP molecule will last only 1- 2 min; in 1 day, a resting human produces and uses as much as 40 kg of ATP ( 3). The great majority of ATP is produced by the mitochondria, more specifically by the respiratory chain, a multimolecular system located in the inner of the two mitochondrial membranes. The chain contains five major complexes of proteins and various prosthetic groups ( complexes I- V) and two 160 M. A. MORRIS THE HUMAN MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME Complex Number of Encoded by Inhibitor subunits mtDNA I NADH dehydrogenase > 25 7 rotenone II succinate dehydrogenase 4 0 - III cytochrome b g 1 antimycin IV cytochrome c oxidase 13 3 cyanide V AlP synthase 12 2 oligomycin To understand the role of mitochondrial mutations in disease, four major phenomena must be considered: the mode of inheritance of mitochondrial DNA of mtDNA; the high rate of mutation of mtDNA; the phenomenon of heteroplasmy; and the distinctive pattern of expression of mitochondrial defects. Mitochondrial inheritance is non- Mendelian. The transmission of ( mtDNA) between generations can be followed by the use of restriction fragment- length polymorphisms ( RFLPs), distinctive features of DNA that vary between normal individuals. In this manner, it has been shown that, in humans as in many other species, an individual receives only maternal mtDNA ( 5); no paternal mitochondrial RFLP has ever been shown to be transmitted. Clinically, this has one obvious effect: hereditary diseases caused by mitochondrial mutations are transmitted exclusively maternally, and THE MEDICAL GENETICS OF THE MITOCHONDRION duction of these proteins. All the remaining proteins of the respiratory chain and all the other proteins of the mitochondrion are encoded in the cell nucleus. The mitochondrial genes are packed as tightly as possible along the chromosome, with essentially no noncoding DNA within or between them ( in the nucleus, genes are split up by noncoding introns, which may be much longer than the expressed exons, and neighboring genes may be separated by millions of bases of apparently nonfunctional DNA). In general, the genes for the proteins and for the ribosomal RNA molecules are punctuated by the transfer RNA genes, elegantly simplifying the control of expression of mitochondrial genes: a large part of the necessary RNA processing- the preparation of messenger RNA molecules coding for single genes- is achieved merely by excising the transfer RNA portions of a single, full- length RNA transcript of the chromosome ( reviewed in reference 4). FIG. 2. The composition of the respiratory chain complexes. H' H' 888e~ nl! r< sUCCinate fumarate 0, H, O The human mitochondrial chromosome is a circular molecule of approximately 16,500 base pairs ( 16.5 kilobases, or kb) of DNA. For a chromosome, this is small; the sum of the human nuclear chromosomes is about 200,000 times this size. It has two complementary strands of DNA, differing in weight as a result of their different chemical composition; they are termed the H ( heavy) and L ( light) strands. The mammalian mitochondrial chromosome ( Fig. 3). is a model of evolutionary economy; every nonessential feature has been eliminated. It carries just 37 genes, 28 of which are encoded in the H strand. Thirteen of the genes encode essential proteins of the respiratory chain, and the remaining 24 encode ribosomal and transfer RNA molecules whose sole function is the pro-smaller molecules, coenzyme Q and cytochrome c ( Fig 1). In the presence of oxygen, the first four complexes and the latter molecules use the energy derived from our food to generate a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane; the fifth complex then allows these protons to flow back into the mitochondrion, while harnessing the energy of the gradient to synthesize ATP. The proton gradient, the ultimate source of so much of our metabolic energy, is generated by the transfer of charge ( as electrons) along the respiratory chain, from complexes I and II to coenzyme Q, and then linearly through complex III, cytochrome c, and complexes IV and V. Inhibition or inefficiency at any stage of the chain will have an effect on ATP production. For example, rotenone prevents complex I from contributing to the proton gradient, but the chain can still function ( with reduced efficiency) via the oxidation of succinate by complex II. However, cyanide shuts down the whole chain, by blocking it at complex IV ( Fig. 2). H' ADP + Pi ATP FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the major elements of the respiratory chain of the mitochondrion. The enzyme complexes are numbered I- V. Abbreviations: CoQ, coenzyme Q; Cyt c, cytochrome c. Vnl 111, No J, 1990 MITOCHONDRIAL MUTATIONS IN DISEASE 161 16.5kb FIG. 3. Genetic map of the human mitochondrial chromosome. The small circles represent transfer RNA genes. All other genes are identified outside the NOS circle: NO, NAOH dehydrogenase subunits ( complex I); CYB, cytochrome b subunit ( complex III); CO, cytochrome c oxidase subunits ( complex IV); and ATP, ATP synthase subunits ( complex V). Inside the circle: 0, origins of replication of the heavy ( H) and light ( L) strands of the chromosome; and LHON, position 11778, the site of the mutation responsible for many cases of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Mutation of the mitochondrial chromosome gives rise to heteroplasmy. Human cells contain, with a few specialized exceptions, many hundreds of mitochondria, and each mitochondrion contains several copies of its chromosome. After a single mutation event, which produces a new form of mtDNA, a cell is therefore heteroplasmic: in its cytoplasm, it has different genetic strains of mitochondria. When such heteroplasmic cells divide, different populations emerge by variable segregation of the mitochondria. In some descendent lines, mutant mitochondria become the more frequent form, whereas in others the normal population will predominate ( 10). In mammals, such segregation of mutant mitochondria between generations can cause a return to homoplasmic animals after only two or three generations ( 11); this has not been demonstrated in humans, but may be the case. If so, one would predict that women with hereditary mitochondrial mutations could give rise to lines of descent differing in the severity of their disease: one line would become less severe from generation to generation, as the normal mitochondria became predominant, whereas the other would worsen as the mutation became prevalent. Thus, heteroplasmy provides the exception noted earlier to the rule that all offspring of a carrier female will receive the mutation. The clinical expression of mitochondrial mutations is very variable and often unpredictable. As a result of heteroplasmy, the clinical expression of mitochondrial mutations can vary greatly. It is pre-eye LHON, Human mitochondrial DNA - I e02 eOI II ~ 03 __ 1111111: 1111111; 111. ATP8 ATP6 e03 all the offspring of a woman with such a hereditary disease will carry the mutation ( there is one exception to this rule described later). The exclusively maternal transmission is perhaps explained purely physically. At fertilization, the human ovum has a high amount of cytoplasm containing tens or hundreds of thousands of mitochondria, whereas the sperm cell possesses very little cytoplasm, with a few mitochondria gathered around the base of the tail. There is therefore a " dilution effect" of paternal mitochondria among the maternal, of one part in many thousands. It is not clear whether a fraction of a percent of our mitochondria are in fact of paternal origin or whether even these few are somehow actively excluded at the moment of fertilization. Mitochondrial DNA mutates faster than nuclear DNA. Comparison of the DNA of human and other mammalian mitochondria has shown that gene sequences change at least six times more rapidly in mitochondria than in the nucleus ( 6,7). This is almost certainly explained by a high rate of mutation coupled with the absence of the DNA repair systems that protect our nuclear genes. In 1987, Neckelmann and colleagues observed that this high rate of mutation would be expected to lead to a disproportionately high rate of maternally inherited diseases ( 8). Interestingly, Linnane and colleagues have also suggested that mtDNA mutations, accumulating throughout the life of an individual, may contribute to aging and to certain degenerative diseases ( 9). I Clin Neuro- ophlhalmol, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1990 162 M. A. MORRIS dictable that mitochondrial mutations will have more effect in tissues with a high requirement for ATP; the most vulnerable tissues are, in order, the CNS ( including the retina), the type I skeletal muscle fibers, the heart, and the kidney ( 12). However, there is also an unpredictable element, produced by the variable proportions of normal and mutant mitochondria in different tissues: some tissues may be asymptomatic, whereas others may be significantly affected. In an excellent study of a family with a maternally inherited mitochondrial myopathy, Wallace and colleagues found a close correlation between the severity of symptoms, the range of clinical manifestations, and the degree of the biochemical defect in nine patients, all of whom presumably had the same mitochondrial mutation ( 12). Similarly, Rotig and colleagues ( 13) found that in a patient with Pearson's syndrome, which affects hematopoiesis, the exocrine pancreas, and the liver and kidneys and is caused by a mitochondrial mutation, the more affected tissues contained a much higher proportion of mutant mtDNA than did the less affected one. Three principal forms of mitochondrial mutation have been detected in human disease. Deletions are the most common form of mitochondrial mutation. As their name implies, deletions involve the loss of a section of the chromosome; they have been found involving as little as 0.4 to as much as 8.5 kb of DNA ( 2.4- 51.5% of the chromosome). They may also involve almost any region of the chromosome, with two notable exceptions: no deletions have been found that involve either of the origins of replication of the chromosome, the sites at which the copying of the mtDNA is initiated. Presumably, any such mutation would be selected against and lost almost immediately. Interestingly, about one third of deletions detected involve exactly the same 5- kb region, stretching from the ATPase8 gene to ND5, so eliminating some genes of complexes I, IV, and V, plus some transfer RNAs ( Fig. 3). The DNA flanking this region has a distinctive repetitive sequence that seems to be responsible for its disproportionate vulnerability ( 14- 17). Duplications of segments of the mitochondrial genome have also been found: these produce chromosomes that are larger than normal, as a result of a second copy of a region having been inserted. Two cases with duplications of up to 7 kb have been reported ( 18) and in some malignancies, a large number of dimeric or larger mitochondrial chromosomes have been observed ( 19). The deleterious effects are probably due not to the presence of two copies of some genes, but to disruption of "',,/ 111, No, J, 1990 the gene into which the duplication has been inserted. Deletions and duplications have so far been found to be invariably heteroplasmic. Although the relative proportions of normal and abnormal mitochondria vary from tissue to tissue, some of the former are always present; evidently the cell requires some normal mitochondria to produce sufficient ATP to survive. Point mutations often have much less severe consequences than deletions. They involve the substitution of a single base pair of the chromosome, generally leading to a structural change and so a functional change in a single protein. To date, Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy ( LHON) is the only disease for which a causative mitochondrial point mutation has been identified. Mitochondrial mutations have been found in a range of human diseases, two classes of which are of particular interest to the neuro- ophthalmologist ( Fig. 4). MITOCHONDRIAL MUTATIONS IN MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOPATHIES The term " mitochondrial cytopathy" covers a range of disorders, sometimes seen as clinically distinct. The diseases included are not clearly defined, with very variable manifestations and considerable overlap of features. A detailed clinical discussion is beyond the scope of this review, but the subject has been comprehensively covered elsewhere ( 20- 24). Essentially, the hypothesis is that conditions such as mitochondrial myopathy, chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia ( CPEO), mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, and syndromes such as that of Keams- Sayre, MELAS ( mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke- like episodes), and MERRF ( mitochondrial epilepsy with ragged red fibers) are different expressions of one etiological entity. In all these disorders there are structurally and biochem- Disease Type of mutation Comments Leber's hereditary Point mutation Homoplasmic optic neuropathy (+ heteroplasmic?) Mitochondrial Deletions + Heteroplasmic cytopathies duplications Pearson's syndrome Deletions Reference 35 Malignancy Dimerization Reference 19 FIG. 4. Diseases associated with characterized mutations of mitochondrial DNA. MITOCHONDRIAL MUTATIONS IN DISEASE 163 ically defective mitochondria and some forms of neuromuscular impairment. Beyond these features, as Petty et al. observed ( 22), a variety of defects have been identified, but there is no consistent association with syndromes. Mitochondrial cytopathies are caused by severe mitochondrial mutations. The concept of a common etiology has been strongly supported by mtDNA analysis; starting in February 1988, with the article of Holt and colleagues ( 25), many groups have reported deletions or duplications of the mitochondrial chromosome in mitochondrial cytopathies. Approximately 90 cases of mitochondrial cytopathy with mitochondrial deletions have been reported, plus two with duplications ( 1416,24,26- 34). Remarkably, there is little correlation between the size of a deletion or the genes affected by it and the clinical symptoms. For example, the smallest deletion yet described was found in a patient diagnosed as having encephalomyopathy and MERRF, with myoclonic epilepsy, progressive ataxia, deafness, and stroke- like episodes; DNA analysis showed that 400 base pairs ( 0.4 kb) of a single gene ( NOS) were deleted ( 30). Yet many patients with CPEO have a deletion more than 10 times as large, the common 5- kb deletion ( 15), and a further patient with the very same 5- kb deletion did not have CPEO but Pearson's syndrome ( McKusick catalogue 26056), which is not an ophthalmological disease ( 35). The citing of heteroplasmy to explain these extraordinary symptomatic variations seems valid. In this last patient, for example, 80- 90% of mitochondria in the affected tissues ( bone marrow, leukocytes, gut) carried the deletion, compared with only 50% in the healthy muscle ( 13). Furthermore, it is generally found that the DNA of leukocyte mitochondria from patients with mitochondrial cytopathies is predominantly normal. The mutual association of mitochondrial cytopathies and mitochondrial DNA deletions is not absolute. Two cases of DNA duplication have already been mentioned ( the diagnoses for the two patients were Keams- Sayre syndrome and mitochondrial myopathy), and there are several further reports indicating the involvement of other mechanisms. Ozawa and colleagues ( 31) analyzed the mtDNA of a mother and daughter, both with CPEO. Both patients had deletions of mtDNA ( in skeletal muscle) but, very surprisingly, the mother had a 2.5- kb deletion and the daughter a 5- kb deletion, with 1.2 kb of deletion in common. The nature of the basic defect here is unknown but could perhaps involve a nuclear gene with some role in controlling mtDNA replication. The MERRF family described by Wallace and colleagues ( 12) has no detectable loss of mtDNA in muscle or in lymphoblasts but presents all the characteristics expected of a severe mitochondrial mutation, including heteroplasmy and maternal transmission: Wallace et al. suggest that either a very small deletion or a point mutation must be present. The fact that both complexes I and IV are defective implies that the mutation is either at a point where complex I and IV genes are in proximity ( for example, between C03 and ND3, Fig. 3) or that a ribosomal or transfer RNA, involved in the synthesis of several mitochondrial proteins, is affected. In a detailed genetic study, Harding and colleagues ( 36) found that 18% of 71 patients had relatives " definitely affected with a similar disorder." Including analysis of other published reports, they observed that about 90% of familial mitochondrial cytopathies were maternally transmitted and that only about half the offspring of affected females were themselves affected. Familial mitochondrial cytopathies were therefore significantly less frequent than isolated cases but were almost all compatible with mitochondrial transmission by a heteroplasmic mother. However, 10% of familial cases were paternally transmitted, implying mutations of nuclear chromosomes. As so many mitochondrial proteins are encoded in the nucleus, including most components of the respiratory chain, it would not be surprising if some mitochondrial cytopathies were caused by nuclear mutations and transmitted in Mendelian fashion; the biochemical defects could be essentially identical to those caused by mitochondrial mutations, although one might expect less symptomatic variation ( between tissues and between individuals), for variable heteroplasmy would not occur. MITOCHONDRIAL MUTATIONS IN LHON Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy has long been considered the " classic" maternally transmitted disease. However, its etiology has also been the cause for much debate. It was thought that not all offspring of carrier females inherited the disease ( 37), and indeed this has not been formally disproved, but the long- term follow- up observations by Seedorff of families first studied by Lundsgard showed that, at least in some cases, the transmission rate could reach 100% ( 38). Transplacental infection was also considered as a possible cause ( 39). Furthermore, there has been a long- standing J Clin Neuro- ophthalmol. Vol. 10. No. 3. 1990 164 M. A. MORRIS debate about the role of defects of cyanide metabolism ( notably of the enzyme rhodanese) in LHON ( 40- 45). The discovery by Wallace and colleagues in 1988 of a point mutation of mtDNA causing LHON in nine of 11 independent pedigrees and its subsequent confirmation seemed to herald the end of the confusion ( 46- 48). The mutation of a single base, at position 11778 of the mitochondrial chromosome, in the gene ND4, leads to the alteration of one amino acid of a subunit of respiratory chain complex I, substituting a histidine for an arginine. This apparently minor change produces a detectable deficiency of complex I function ( 49) and, ultimately, LHON. However, much remains unexplained about the etiology of LHON. Only a proportion of LHON families have this mutation; combining published cases and those of seven families analyzed at this Institute indicates that only 29 of 47 families have the mutation at position 11778 ( 62%) ( 46- 48,50- 52), implying that there is at least one other mtDNA mutation. Furthermore, there is convincing evidence in one family of LHON caused by a nuclear gene ( the disease was transmitted by a male), with the primary defect probably being of the enzyme rhodanese ( 42). It has been shown in the author's laboratory that the affected members of this family do not have the 11778 mutation. The considerable problem of the relative frequencies of affected males and females is still outstanding: approximately six of seven sufferers are male ( 37,53,54). One explanation for this is the secondary involvement of a gene on the X chromosome, modifying the effect of " the Leber's gene." However, there is no direct evidence for such a gene, and a preliminary genetic linkage analysis of the Xchromosome in three LHON families in Australia has made its existence unlikely ( 55). No other mechanism for this difference is apparent; it is conceivable that there is simply a different tolerance to the complex I deficiency in the male and female retina. Most groups have found the LHON mutation to be homoplasmic, but Holt et al. ( 52) have recently reported that almost all of their patients with the 11778 mutation are heteroplasmic, with a proportion of normal mtDNA, and that the relative proportions of mutant and normal DNA correlate with the risk of clinical LHON development. If this is confirmed in other families it may simplify explanations of the variability of expression of LHON. Wallace et al. have also suggested that such a heteroplasmic point mutation may be involved, in , \',,/ 10, Nul, 1490 families with LHON plus infantile bilateral striatal necrosis ( 46). THE FUTURE In conclusion, it is evident that mtDNA mutations are responsible for a number of neuroophthalmological disorders, but what practical help can the geneticist offer the clinician now, and what does the future hold? One option available now is diagnosis. In the author's laboratory, detection of the LHON mutation 11778 has been offered as a diagnostic aid for approximately 1 year; while the test is not infallible, for only about 60% of familial cases involve this mutation, a positive result has an obvious value. The test requests only a small blood sample. For the mitochondrial cytopathies, DNA analysis of muscular biopsy samples may become a routine diagnostic technique, and when more cases have been described, it may be that a knowledge of the degree of heteroplasmy will be a useful prognostic guide. It should be mentioned that an accurate family history can be a valuable diagnostic aid. Some groups are using a more detailed knowledge of the defect to improve the specificity of therapy. Wallace relates three such examples: the use of coenzyme Q in Keams- Sayre syndrome, ascorbate and menadione in a complex III deficiency, and riboflavin in a complex I deficiency ( 56) and Shoffner et al. ( 16) noted a marked improvement in a patient with a complex I defect treated with coenzyme QI0 and succinate ( which enters the chain at complex II). Cagianut and colleagues ( 42) emphasized the importance of diet in families with defects of the respiratory chain and included a useful list of contraindicated foodstuffs that contain cyanide or inhibit its metabolism. Although the article refers specifically to defects of cyanide metabolism, the avoidance of certain foods may have practical value in other cases. The LHON patients at the author's Institute are so advised, and they are also strongly advised against smoking, which has often been cited as being involved in the onset and severity of LHON. The future? Some of the outstanding puzzles have been discussed earlier. For example, it is clearly necessary to determine the remaining mutations in familial LHON. It is to be hopes that more frequent analysis of mtDNA in mitochondrial cytopathies will reveal associations between the nature of the mutation and the degree of heteroplasmy and the prognosis for the patient. Fi- MITOCHONDRIAL MUTATIONS IN DISEASE 165 nally, the precise identification of defects will be sure to lead to more effective and more specific metabolic therapies. In the very long term, an understanding of the processes ( which may be random, selective, or both) leading to variable heteroplasmy may permit their manipulation and so provide the hope of a genuine cure. Acknowledgment: I am indebted to Professor E. Engel and Dr. C. D. Delozier- Blanchet for their invaluable encouragement and numerous discussions, and to Professor A. Safran, Dr. T. Stautz, Dr. B. Cagianut, and N. Malik for many interesting discussions and for access to DNA samples of patients. REFERENCES 1. Cavalier- Smith T. Eukaryotes with no mitochondria [ News and Views). Nature 1987; 326: 332- 3. 2. Lehninger AL. The mitochondrion. New York: WA Benjamin, 1964: 7. 3. Stryer L. Biochemistry. 2nd ed. San Francisco: WH Freeman and Co, 1981: 241. 4. Tzagoloff A, Myers AM. Genetics of mitochondrial biogenesis. Ann Rev Biochem 1986; 55: 249- 85. 5. Giles RE, Blanc H, Cann HM, Wallace DC. Maternal inheritance of human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77: 671~ 9. 6. Brown WM, George M, Wilson AC. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979; 76: 1967- 71. 7. Miyata T, Hayashida H, Kikuno R, et aJ. Molecular clock of silent substitution: at least six- fold preponderance of silent changes in mitochondrial genes over those in nuclear genes. ! Mol EvoI1982; 19: 28- 35. 8. Neckelmann N, Li K, Wade RP, Shuster R, Wallace DC. eDNA sequence of a human skeletal muscle ADP/ ATP translocator: lack of a leader peptide, divergence from a fibroblast translocator eDNA, and coevolution with mitochondrial DNA genes. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 1987; 84: 7580- 4. 9. Linnane AW, Marzuki S, Ozawa T, Tanaka M. Mitochondrial DNA mutations as an important contributor to aging and degenerative diseases. Lancet 1989; 1: 642- 5. 10. Linnane AW, Haslam JM, Lukins HB, Nagley P. The biogenesis of mitochondria in microorganisms. Ann Rev Microbioi 1972; 26: 163- 98. 11. Ashley MY, Laipis PJ, Hauswirth WW. Rapid segregation of heteroplasmic bovine mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17: 73~ 31. 12. Wallace DC, Zheng X, Lott Mr, et al. Familial Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy ( MERRF): genetic, pathophysiological, and biochemical characterization of a mitochondrial DNA disease. Cell 1988; 55: 601- 10. 13. R6tig A, Colonna M, Cormier V, et aJ. Intramolecular recombinations of the human mitochondrial genome in Pearson's syndrome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989; 51: 1069- 70. . 14. Moraes CT, DiMauro S, Zeviani M, et aJ. Mitochondnal DNA deletions in progressive external ophthalmoplegia and Keams- Sayre syndrome. N Engl! Med 1989; 320: 1293- 9. 15. Schon EA, Rizzuto R, Moraes CT, et aJ. A direct repeat is a hotspot for large- scale deletion of human mitochondrial DNA. Science 1989; 244: 346- 9. 16. Shoffner JM, Lott Mr, Voljavec AS, et aJ. Spontaneous Keams- Sayre/ chronic external ophthalmoplegia plu~ syndrome associated with a mitochondrial DNA deletion: a slip- replication model and metabolic therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 7952-- 6. 17. Wallace DC, Lott Mr, Voljavec AS, Shoffner JM. Mitochondrial DNA deletions in Keams- Sayre syndrome can be associated with direct repeats. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989; 51: 1101- 2. 18. Poulton J, Deadman ME, Gardiner RM. Tandem direct duplications of mitochondrial DNA in mitochondrial myopathy: analysis of nucleotide sequence and tissue distribution. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17: 10223- 9. 19. Robberson DL, Gay ML, Wilkins CEo Genetically altered human mitochondrial DNA and a cytoplasmic view of malignant transformation. In: Arrighi FE, Rao PN, Stubblefield E, eds. Genes, chromosomes, and neoplasia. New York: Raven Press, 1981: 12~ 56. 20. Egger I, Lake BD, Wilson J. Mitochondrial cytopathy. A multisystem disorder with ragged red fibres on muscle biopsy. Arch Dis Child 1981; 56: 741- 52. 21. Egger I, Wilson J. Mitochondrial inheritance in a mitochondrially mediated disease. N Engl! Med 1983; 309: 142-- 6. 22. Petty RKH, Harding AE, Morgan- Hughes JA. The clinical features of mitochondrial myopathy. Brain 1986; 109: 91~ 8. 23. R6tig A, Bonnefont JP, Colonna M, et al. Les remaniements du genome mitochondrial dans les deficits energetiques de l'enfant: de nouvelles maladies de systeme? Med Sci 1989; 5: 459- 71. 24. Rutledge SL, Johns DR, Hurko O. Mitochondrial DNA analysis in a mitochondrial cytopathy overlap syndrome. Am! Hum Genet 1989; 45: A216. 25. Holt II, Harding AE, Morgan- Hughes JA. Deletions of muscle mitochondrial DNA in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Nature 1988; 331: 717- 9. 26. Harding AE, Holt 11, Morgan- Hughes JA. Deletions of muscle mitochondrial DNA in patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Am! Hum Genet 1988; 43: A86. 27. Johns DR, Drachman DB, Hurko O. Identical mitochondrial DNA deletion in blood and muscle. Lancet 1989; 1: 393- 4. 28. Johns DR, Hurko O. Preferential amplification and molecular characterization of junction sequences of a pathogenetic deletion in human mitochondrial DNA. Genomics 1989; 5: 623- 8. 29. Lestienne P, Ponsot G. Keams- Sayre syndrome with muscle mitochondrial DNA deletion. Lancet 1988; 1: 885. 30. Saifuddin- Noer A, Marzuki S, Trounce I, Byrne E. Mitochondrial DNA deletion in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy. Lancet 1988; 2: 1253- 4. 31. Ozawa T, Yoneda M, Tanaka M, et aJ. Maternal inheritance of deleted mitochondrial DNA in a family with mitochondrial myopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1988; 154: 1240- 7. 32. Poulton J, Deadman ME, Gardiner RM. Duplications of mitochondrial DNA in mitochondrial myopathy. Lancet 1989; 1: 236- 40. 33. Zeviani M, Moraes CT, DiMauro S, et al. Deletions of mitochondrial DNA in Kearns- Sayre syndrome. Neurology 1988; 38: 1339- 46. 34. Zeviani M, Moraes CT, Shanske S, et al. Deletion of mitochondrial DNA in Keams- Sayre syndrome. Am! Hum Genet 1988; 43: A100. 35. R6tig A, Colonna M, Bonnefont JP, et al. Mitochondrial DNA deletion in Pearson's marrow/ pancreas syndrome. Lancet 1989; 1: 902- 3. 36. Harding AE, Petty RKH, Morgan- Hughes JA. Mitochondrial myopathy: a genetic study of 71 cases. ! Med Genet 1988; 25: 528- 35. 37. Van Senus AHC. Leber's disease in the Netherlands. Doc OphthalmoI1963; 17: 1- 162. 38. Seedorff T. The inheritance of Leber's disease: a genealogical follow- up study. Acta Ophthalmol ( Copenh) 1985; 63: 1~. 39. Erickson RP. Leber's optic atrophy, a possible example of maternal inheritance. Am! Hum Genet 1972; 24: 348- 9. 40. Wilson J. Leber's hereditary optic atrophy: a possible defect of cyanide metabolism. Clin Sci 1965; 29: 50~ 15. 41. Cagianut B, Rhyner K, Furrer W, Schnebli HP. Thiosul- JClin Neuro- ophthalmol, Vol. 10, No. 3. 1990 166 M. A. MORRIS phate- sulphur transferase ( rhodanese) deficiency in Leber's hereditary optic atrophy. Lancet 1981; 2: 981- 2. 42. Cagianut B, Schnebli HP, Rhyner K, Furrer J. Decreased thiosulfate sulfur transferase ( rhodanese) in Leber's hereditary optic atrophy. Klin Wochenschr 1984; 62: 85(}.. 4. 43. Poole CjM, Kind PRN. Deficiency of thiosulphate sulphurtransferase ( rhodanese) in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Br Med J1986; 292: 1229- 30. 44. Berninger TA, Meyer LV, Siess E, et al. Leber's hereditary optic atrophy: further evidence for a defect of cyanide metabolism? Br JOphthalmol 1989; 73: 314- 6. 45. Whitehouse DB, Poole CjM, Kind PRN, Hopkinson DA. Rhodanese isozymes in three subjects with Leber's optic neuropathy. JMed Genet 1989; 26: 113-- 5. 46. Wallace DC, Singh G, Lott MI, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Science 1988; 242: 1427- 30. 47. Yoneda M, Tsuji S, Yamauchi T, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation in family with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Lancet 1989; 1: 107~ 7. 48. Singh G, Lott MI, Wallace DC. A mitochondrial DNA mutation as a cause of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. N Engl JMed 1989; 320: 1300- 5. 49. Parker WD, Oley CA, Parks JK. A defect in mitochondrial " · . f 10, No. 3, 19911 electron- transport activity ( NADH- coenzyme Q oxidoreductase) in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. N Engl JMed 1989; 320: 1331- 3. 50. Vilkki J, Savontaus M- L, Nikoskelainen EK. Genetic heterogeneity in Leber hereditary optic neuroretinopathy revealed by mitochondrial DNA polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 1989; 45: 20~ 11. 51. Hotta Y, Hayakawa M, Saito K, et al. Diagnosis of Leber's optic neuropathy by means of polymerase chain reaction amplification. Am JOphthalmoI1989; 108: 601- 2. 52. Holt IJ, Miller DH, Harding AE. Genetic heterogeneity and mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. JMed Genet 1989; 26: 739- 43. 53. Waardenburg PJ. Some remarks on the clinical and genetic puzzle of Leber's optic neuritis. JGenet Hum 1969; 17: 47996. 54. Nikoskelainen E. New aspects of the genetic, etiologic, and clinical puzzle of Leber's disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 1482- 4. 55. Chen JD, Cox I, Denton MJ. Preliminary exclusion of an X- linked gene in Leber optic atrophy by linkage analysis. Hum Genet 1989; 82: 203- 7. 56. Wallace DC. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and neuromuscular disease. Trends Genet 1989; 5: 9- 13. |