| OCR Text |
Show ) ) Figure #___________________________________________________________________Page 10-1: Short Range Revenue Estimates for New Projects and Reconstruction (1999-2005) . . 197 10-2: Long Range Revenue Estimates for New Projects and Reconstruction (2006-2020) .. 198 10-3: Transportation Revenue Projections, Clay County, Minnesota (1999-2020) ........199 10-4: Transportation Revenue Projections, Dilworth, Minnesota (1999-2020) ...........199 10-5: Transportation Revenue Projections, Moorhead, Minnesota (1999-2020) ..........200 10-6: Transportation Revenue Projections, Cass County, North Dakota (1999-2020)......200 10-7: Transportation Revenue Projections, Fargo, North Dakota (1999-2020) ...........201 11-8: Transportation Revenue Projections, West Fargo, North Dakota (1999-2020).......201 11-1: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - Clay County...................204 11-2: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - Dilworth......................211 11-3: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - Moorhead.....................214 11-4: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - MnDOT ......................224 11-5: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - Cass County...................229 11-6: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - Fargo.........................236 11-7: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - West Fargo....................254 11-8: Potential Future Transportation Improvements - NDDOT ......................260 11-9: Minnesota Short and Long Range Transportation Improvement Projects...........268 11-10: North Dakota Short and Long Range Transportation Improvement Projects........269 11-11: Relationship of Roadway Improvement Projects to Identified Issue Areas of Goals and Objectives.............................................270 11-12: Moorhead & Dilworth Roadways 2020 Functional Classification Designations .....292 11-13: Fargo & West Fargo Roadways 2020 Functional Classification Designations.......293 11-14: Area Roads 2020 Functional Classification Designations.......................294 12-1: Relationship Between TEA-21 Goals and COGs Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).....................................................296 List of Appendices I. Public Involvement Information II. 1996 ADT Volume Counts III. Bridges Below Standard in 1998 IV. Excerpts from 1995 Metro Bikeway Plan V. Excerpts from 1991 Metro Pedestrian Plan VI. Job and Household Growth Tables VII. Level of Service Descriptions VIII. Technical Memo 1 IX. Technical Memo 2 X. Suggested ITS Applications to Short and Long Range Projects XL Air Quality Compliance XII. Environmental Justice Review Group -v- |
