| OCR Text |
Show 94 James R. Clark.64 the There can be little doubt that the United Order, cooperatives, the conquest of tablish the Kingdom of God on a earth wilderness, and the attempt required control. needed to make the corporate machine run, and this necessitated careful organization and regulation by the early 1890s it members of God and was much no was was less Specialists of individuals. clear that overt church influence of its likely.65 With the realization that the Kingdom polygamy and political involvement, church in the affairs of its members Despite these vast began t1ormon 1 eaders (at control changes in Mormon theory and practice dur Ericksen describes them traditional ex- to wane. ing the early progressive period, controls conserve But longer imminent, with the demise of the United Order criticism of necessary. were specialization cooperatives, with widespread settlement, and with intense ternal to es as of a de fens ive different sort became measures values, beliefs, and ideologies.66 the turn of the century) attempti ng designed Clark to to sees regai n 64See Ephraim Edward Ericksen, Psychological and Ethical As Mormon Group Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1922), pp. 86-87; Klaus Hansen, Quest for Emoire (East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press, 1967), p. 128; Thomas O'Dea, The Mormons, pp. 224-25; and James R. Clark, "Church and State Relationships in Education in Utah," (Ph.D. dissertation, Utah State Uni vers i ty 1958). pects of , 65Ericksen, 9i. o. 66Ibid. See also David B. Tyack, ed., Turning Points in American Educational Histor (Waltham, Massachusetts: Blaisdell Pub Tyack, describing the end of the early p. 323. lishing Company, 1967 progressive era, asserts that the Mormon-supported Utah Plan (1919) IImade the school a moral policeman, responsible for both in and out-of For a more detailed account of this plan, see school deportment. , II Chapter V of this dissertation. |