| OCR Text |
Show ""111he-Uhivers1ty far'private parties.) A slight difference , "; 'mxbetwaen thew-I am attempting ta campase. However, EEEBypoaitianeaf‘fiv.'fiamiltcn.J Bath in his interview afid also 1 mm the-aammunicatien which you.sent me, he takes the positicn :*;Ehat Ehis flarkshould be done far a naminal charge. '13 aaya, "Ihe charge shculd he very nominal." In fact, The-opinien of $11? geap19 13 that whatever a reascnahle charge ma 3 be, a' "Whominalfi charga is net 3 reascnahle charge, but virtua11y no *éhath'ét a;1;~-This is how they 1121 the pagitimn cf 1r. fiamilton. f" Yaurtfionmrable Csmmission 1111 read: 1y see tEwt un1es3 the 1%7Legialatare:seta~uyfa syeczak fund (which it has not.fione) fdr Jjfihe test1ng work under censiéeratlan, th 9 University cannot do ~1 .3 it atra asminal charge.‘ IE '- I fegl that I? shoulfi do itffar a reasonable charge. I am .7 Lia.syapathy V111 ficing the mark, ané with having theaterms agreed "yea 1n advance, if possible, 59 that the parties having the work approximate ,5; dune :111 kncw before the-work is undertaken, what the 11 charge w111 be. Also I think that all payments shoulé go-thraugh "Jflrtha £13931 department of the University, and that the work shougd ‘ h3ve the definite aggraval by the aflministration. 1 E1. for other 1 But I see ne reason way public funda, apnrcpriated because 'fiurfioses, should_be diverted to do-private work, simply 3(5"a private owner is required to meet certai n regulatorv rucuirementa I 1- sat up by your tharable Body. LegisWhen we did the public health work for the state, the n?:«and m1 agaeura eat up.an tppropriatian for that wo‘n,‘s {1‘13"} 1111 ,1 "5P1irfifl |
