AZ vs. CA:25 California Exhibits, Vol. XXV; Nos. 7501-7859

page 4

of Complaint there is manifest error, inadvertently arrived at, in this: 1. The opinion and decision of this Court finds and holds that "Arizona does not assert any right to the benefit of the undertaking of California, in conformity to the Boulder Canyon Project Act, to restrict its own use of the water", when in truth and in fact Arizona has at all times, and now does, assert a right to the benefit of the undertaking of California, in conformity to the Boulder Canyon Project Act, to restrict its use of the water. 2. The opinion and decision of this Court finds and hold that "The allegations and prayer of the bill are of significance only if Arizona, in advance of any act of appropriation, and independently of any rights which she may have acquired under the Boulder Canyon Project Act, may demand a judicial decree exempting the available water of the river, or some of it, from appropriation by other states until the indefinite time in the future when she or her inhabitants may see fit to appropriate it" when in truth and in fact the relief sought by the State of Arizona under its bill is not independent of "any rights which she may have acquired under the Boulder Canyon Project Act" but one of the grounds for relief asserted and relied upon by the State of Arizona in its bill is the benefit of the undertaking of California, in conformity to the Boulder Canyon Project Act, limiting California's use of the water. 3. The opinion and decision of this Court herein, de-