| OCR Text |
Show Exhibit Iden. Evid. No. Page No. Page No. 2164 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 12, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Johnson. [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2165 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (at proper place, insert). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2166 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (on page 1, line 6). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2167 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (on page 2, line 15). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2168 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. King (. . . . That the consent). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2169 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Pittman (on page 2, line 13). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2170 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Pittman (on page 5, strike out). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2171 H.R. 5773, 70th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Dec. 13, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Pittman (insert at bot-ton of page 5). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
