| OCR Text |
Show -2- Exhibit Iden. Evid. No. Page No. Page No. 2052 H.R. 15349, 69th Cong., 2d Sess., House, Dec. 17, 1926, as introduced. (Third Swing-Johnson Bill) (Supp. Pre-Trial Item 822.) 2053 H.R. 9826 (Union Calendar No. 587, Report No. 1657) 69th Cong., 2d Sess., House, Dec. 22, 1926, as introduced. (Third Swing-Johnson Bill) (Supp. Pre-Trial Item 823.) 2054 S. 1868, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, Dec. 21, 1925, as introduced. (Third Swing-Johnson Bill) (Supp. Pre-Trial Item 824.) 198* S. 3331, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., Feb. 27, 1926 (Third Swing-Johnson Bill) [Pre-Trial (Supp, No. 1) Item 821.] 7760 2055 S. 3331 (Calendar No. 666), 69th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, April 23, 1926, as introduced. (Third Swing-Johnson Bill) (Supp. Pre-Trial Item 826.) 2056 S. 3331, 69th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Jan. 26, 1927, Amendment proposed by Mr. Mayfield. (Third Swing-Johnson Bill.) 2057 S. 3331, 69th Cong., 2d Sess., Senate, Jan. 26, 1927, Amendment proposed by Mr. Sheppard. (Third Swing-Johnson Bill.) ?Previously admitted in evidence. |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
