| OCR Text |
Show -5- Exhibit No. 1218 Iden. Evid. Page No. Page No. Extracts from An Equitable Basis for Solution of the Colorado River Controversy, by G. E. P. Smith, Dec. 15, 1928. (pp. 2, 8, 9) 10,469 1219 Extract from State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering and Irrigation, Bull. No. 19, Santa Ana Investigation (1928). (p. 103) 10,469 1220 Extract from State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Water Rights, Bull. No. 7, San Gabriel Investigation, Analysis and Conclusions (1929). (pp. 11, 34-35) 10,469 1221 Extract from State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Water Resources, Bull. No. 33, Rainfall Penetration and Consumptive Use of Water in Santa Ana River Valley and Coastal Plain (1930). (p. 21) 10,500 1222 Extract from U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Technical Bull. No. 185, Irrigation Requirements of the Arid and Semiarid Lands of the Southwest, by Fortier and Young (1930). (p. 35) 1223 Extract from Return Water and Drainage Recovery from Irrigation (Discussion by R. I. Meeker), 94 Transactions of American Society of Civil Engineers, Paper No. 1730 (1930). (pp. 338-39) 10,500 1224 Extract from State of California Dept. of Public Works, Div. of Water Re- 10,439 |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |
