| OCR Text |
Show Airing Democracy: Politics and Broadcast Television Travis Currit Media Tenor. 2004. The Presidential Nomination: TV Image of George W. Bush and the Democratic Candidates, 111-2/19/2004. <http://www.mediatenor.com/US-Elec_040220.pdf> (23 March 2004). National Annenberg Election Survey. 2000. The Public Learned About Bush and Gore from Conventions; Half Ready to Make an Informed Choice. <http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/ pdf/naes2000/2000_report5.pdf> (4 March 2004). -. 2004a. About One Third of Super Tuesday Democratic Voters Say They Know Enough to Make an Informed Choice. <http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_kn owlege-dem-candidates-supertuesday_02-27_pr.pdf> (4 March 2004). -. 2004b. Voters Have Much to Learn From Debates, National Annenberg Election Survey Shows. <http://www.annenbergpub-licpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_voter-have-much-to-learn_09-29_pr.pdf> (1 April 2005). National Association of Broadcasters. 2002. Nationwide Poll Finds Broad Voter Approval of Broadcast Election Coverage. <http://www.nab.org/Newsroom/PressRel/Releases/Wirthlin.pdf> (20 March 2004). New America Foundation. 2004. Policy Backgrounder: The Decline of Broadcasters' Public Interest Obligations. <http://www.newameri-ca.net/Download_Docs/pdfs/Pub_File_1518_l.pdf> (7 April 2004). Papper, R. A., M.E. Holmes, and M.N. Popovich. 2004- "Middletown Media Studies." The International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal, Issue 1: 4-43. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004a. Perceptions of Partisan Bias Seen as Growing-Especially by Democrats. A survey conducted in association with the Pew Internet and American Life Project. -. 2004b. The C-SPAN Audience: After 25 Years... <http://www.peo-ple-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=87> (27 June 2004). Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2000a. ePolitics: A Study of the 2000 Presidential campaign on the Internet. <http://www.journal-ism.org/resources/research/reports/campaign2000/epolitics/defaul t.asp> (5 February 2004). -. 2000b. In The Public Interest? A Content Study of Early Press Coverage of the 2000 Presidential Campaign. <http://www.journal-ism.org/resources/research/reports/campaign2000/interest/default. asp> (2 February 2004). -. 2002. "How Strong is the Case for Quality?" Special Report: Local TV News: On the Road to Irrelevance. <http://www.journalism.Org/resources/research/reports/localTV/2 002/public.asp> (5 March 2004). -•. 2004. State of the News Media 2004. <http://www.stateofthenews-media.org/index.asp> (17 March 2004). Rosenstiel, T. and D. Iverson. 2002. "Politics and TV Can Mix." Los Angeles Times, 15 October, A4. Tyndall Report. 2004. Campaign Countdown. <http://www.tyndallre-port.com/campaign.html> (6 June 2004). U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Statistical Abstract of the United States. <http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-04.html> (14 April 2005). U.S. Department of Commerce. 1998. Charting the Digital Broadcasting Future: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligations of Digital Television Broadcasters. <http://www.ntia.doc.gov/pubintadvcom/piacreport.pdf> (4 March 2004). Waldman, P. 1998. Free Time and Advertising: The 1997 New Jersey Governor's Race. Annenberg Public Policy Center. Wisconsin Advertising Project. 2002. Post'9/11 Positive Campaign TV Advertising Become 'Negativity as Usual.' <http://polisci.wisc.edu/tvadvertising/Press_Releases/Press_Relea se_PDFs/Release%202002%20October%2023rd.doc> (25 June 2004). -. 2004- Candidates Airing Twice As Many TV Ads in Iowa than New Hampshire. <http://polisci.wisc.edu/tvadvertising/Press_Releases/ Press_Release_PDFs/FINAL%20Wisconsin%20Advertising%20 Project%201-14-04.pdf> (23 March 2004). 82 |
