| OCR Text |
Show Page 25 TABLE I-C: RELIANCE ON PL 480 A. PL 480 provides what per cent of Arabic acquisitions? B. What per cent of PL 480 receipts are retained? C. PL 480 constitutes what percentage of Arabic books cataloged? D. Size of PI 480 cataloging arrearage? Arizona Berkeley Binghamton Boston College UCLA Chicago Columbia Cornell Hartford Harvard Hoover Illinois Indiana Kentucky Michigan NYPL NYU Portland Princeton0 use Texas Utah Virginia Yale A 99 60 90 95 60 75a 80-85 90 95 56 NA 98 80-85 99 60 75 100 98 50 apx 99.9 80 60e 99.9 95 .;-•• I 90 80 95 95-98 75 90 75-80 95 ' 99b 95 90 95 95 100 81 NA "none" 99 98° 99d 95 90 99.9 80-85 C 98 80-90f f 90r 95 60 80f 85-90f 90' 95 79f 100 100 85 " 99 75 75 81.4 99 33-50 99.9 80 60e 100 95 D 3,810 7-8,000 1,500 1,000 400 5,000 325 2,390 191 3,416* 1,000 ' 3,000 875 o: 950 5,000 3,000 1,900 150 5-6,000 746: 550 5,000 45-4,700 ^ o t typical; non-PL 480 input has been below normal for past 2 years Portland & Hartford share a set. wot reported but known by personal contact. Expect to retain about 30 per cent in the future. formally PL 480 receipts form a larger percentage. Higher than typical. ^Library staff absent; figures compiled by the Director hRcduced to 200 by 3-15-74 All receipts are given only partial cataloging. JH 746 received since Sopt., 1.972." |
