OCR Text |
Show 28 generous sentiment, which may interfere with entire subjection to his will ? No man, who seriously considers what human nature is, and what it was made for, can think of setting up a claim to a fellow-creature. What! own a spiritual being, a being made to know and adore God, and who is to outlive the sun and stars! vVhat! chain to our lowest uses a bein~ made for truth and virtue! Convert into a brut; instrument that intelligent nature on which the Idea of Duty has dawned, and which is a nobler type of God than all outward creation! Should we not deem it a wrong which no punishment could expiate, were one of our children seized as property, and driven by the whip to toil? And shall God's child, dearer to him tban an only son to a human parent, be thus degraded? Every thing else may be owned in the universe ; but a moral, rational being cannot be property. Suns and stars may be owned, but not the lowest spirit. Toucb any tbing but tbis. Lay not your hand on God's rational offspring. Tbe whole spiritual world cries out, Forbear ! The highest intelligences recognise their own nature, their own rights, in the humblest human being. By that priceless, immortal spirit wbicb dwells in bim, by that likeness of God wbich he wears, tread him not in the dust, confound him not with the brute. 29 We have thus seen that a human being cannot rightfully be held and used as property, No legislation, not that of all countries or wodds, could make him so. Let this be laid down, as a first, fundamental trutb. Let us hold it fast, as a most sacred, precious truth. Let us hold it fast against all customs, all laws, all rank, wealth, and power. Let it be armed with the whole authority of the civilized and Christian wodd. I have taken it for granted that no reader would be so wanting in moral discrimination and moral feeling, as to urge that men may rightfully be seized and held as property, because various governments have so ordained. What! is human legislation the measure of rigbt? Are God's laws to be repealed by man's? Can government do no wrong? vVhat is the history of human governments but a record of wrongs? How much does the progress of civilization consist in the substitution of just and humane, for barbarous and oppressive laws ? Government, indeed, has ordained slavery, and to JYOvernrnent the individual is in no case to offer ;esistance. But criminal legislation ought to be freely and earnestly exposed. lnjustice is never so terrible, and never so corrupting, as when armed with the sanctions of law. The authority of government, instead of being a re3son for silence under wrongs, is a reason for protesting against wrong with the undivided energy of argument, entreaty, and solemn admonition. |